Open to interpretation? Inconsistent reporting of lifetime nonsuicidal self-injury across two common assessments.

心理学 心理测量学 临床心理学 测试有效性 口译(哲学) 毒物控制 伤害预防 医疗急救 医学 计算机科学 程序设计语言
作者
Kealagh Robinson,Marc Wilson
出处
期刊:Psychological Assessment [American Psychological Association]
卷期号:32 (8): 726-738 被引量:30
标识
DOI:10.1037/pas0000830
摘要

Nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) is typically assessed using either single-item questionnaires or checklists of common behaviors, but preliminary research suggests that checklists produce higher lifetime prevalence rates.In 2 preregistered studies (combined n ϭ 1,364), we tested whether memory cueing afforded by behavioral checklists accounts for this discrepancy.Participants reported their lifetime NSSI history using both a single-item and a checklist, with presentation order randomized across participants.Nearly a third of participants reported inconsistent NSSI histories on the 2 assessments, with participants 1.57 times more likely to report an NSSI history on a checklist than on a single-item.Counter to the memory account, this discrepancy was evident even when participants completed the checklist first, suggesting that the increased prevalence estimates captured by checklists are unlikely to simply reflect memory facilitation.Across the 2 samples, 12.5% of participants would have been incorrectly screened out in 2-step assessments; these participants were more likely to have engaged in NSSI historically, less likely to self-injure by cutting, and (in Study 2 only) were more likely to be men.These studies suggest that the inconsistencies across 2 of the most common NSSI assessments arise because people dissimilar to the lay conceptualization of self-injury are less likely to endorse a single-item, even when they have affirmed engaging in self-injury behaviors on a checklist.We argue that single-item and checklist assessments capture different aspects of NSSI, such that future research should distinguish between behaviorally identified NSSI assessed with behavioral checklists and self-identified NSSI assessed with single-item assessments. Public Significance StatementYoung adults were 1.57 times more likely to report a lifetime history of nonsuicidal self-injury on a behavioral checklist than on a single screening question, with no evidence that this difference is because behavioral checklists better facilitate recall.Instead, people dissimilar to the lay understanding of self-injury were more likely to report inconsistent self-injury histories, suggesting that screening questions rely on subjective interpretation of nonsuicidal self-injury behaviors.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
学术通zzz发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
天津中医药峰完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
菠萝炒蛋加饭完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
minino完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
moon发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
Judy完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
11秒前
话哈哈完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
su完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
李健应助chrysan采纳,获得10
20秒前
顾矜应助ChencanFang采纳,获得20
20秒前
郝好完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
25秒前
9℃完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
sharks完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
28秒前
天天快乐应助手可摘星辰采纳,获得10
29秒前
29秒前
29秒前
30秒前
lynn完成签到 ,获得积分10
31秒前
34秒前
123456完成签到 ,获得积分10
34秒前
学术通zzz发布了新的文献求助10
34秒前
王小乐发布了新的文献求助10
35秒前
一二发布了新的文献求助10
36秒前
黑糖珍珠完成签到 ,获得积分10
37秒前
Hello应助踏雪飞鸿采纳,获得10
37秒前
chrysan发布了新的文献求助10
38秒前
38秒前
42秒前
43秒前
cx完成签到 ,获得积分10
45秒前
稀饭发布了新的文献求助10
45秒前
ChencanFang发布了新的文献求助20
45秒前
46秒前
ll发布了新的文献求助10
51秒前
无辜的豌豆完成签到 ,获得积分10
51秒前
52秒前
56秒前
高分求助中
【此为提示信息,请勿应助】请按要求发布求助,避免被关 20000
ISCN 2024 – An International System for Human Cytogenomic Nomenclature (2024) 3000
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 2000
Encyclopedia of Geology (2nd Edition) 2000
105th Edition CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 1600
Maneuvering of a Damaged Navy Combatant 650
Fashion Brand Visual Design Strategy Based on Value Co-creation 350
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3777918
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3323510
关于积分的说明 10214551
捐赠科研通 3038674
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1667606
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 798207
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 758315