乳酸
水解
酶水解
化学
酶
生产(经济)
废物管理
制浆造纸工业
生物化学
有机化学
细菌
生物
工程类
遗传学
宏观经济学
经济
作者
Nosaibeh Nosrati‐Ghods,Abdul M. Petersen,Catharine Elizabeth Bosman,Marthinus W. Myburgh,Lorenzo Favaro,Marinda Viljoen‐Bloom,Johann F. Görgens
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.bej.2024.109615
摘要
To maintain the increasing consumer demand for plastics, more sustainable production methods are required in parallel to innovative recycling methods to reduce the disposal of waste plastics. Lactic acid (LA) derived from enzymatic hydrolysis of waste poly(lactic acid) (PLA) can be used for PLA production. Thus, this study compared the profitability of six PLA production scenarios through Aspen Plus® simulations and techno-economic analysis. Three PLA production pathways were investigated: no hydrolysis of waste PLA (base case), low (50 %) and high (90 %) enzymatic conversion of waste PLA. The LA from PLA hydrolysis was combined with virgin LA in both decentralized and centralized settings. For the decentralized setting, the minimum selling price (MSP) of PLA in the base case (1.75 US$/kg) was 6–8 % lower than for scenarios utilizing waste PLA. For the centralized settings, the MSP in the base case (2.70 US$/kg) was similar to the scenarios utilizing waste PLA. Both settings were below market price (5.14 US$/kg), meaning both settings were profitable, and PLA production from enzymatically hydrolyzed waste PLA was deemed cost-competitive with PLA from virgin LA. • Six poly(lactic acid) (PLA) production scenarios were developed and simulated. • Lactic acid feedstock from A-molasses fermentation was cheaper than buying it. • Waste poly(lactic acid) was hydrolysed to lactic acid using a cutinase-like enzyme. • Waste poly(lactic acid) hydrolysis was most attractive in a centralized facility. • Both the centralized and decentralized PLA facilities were economically feasible.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI