电休克疗法
依托咪酯
异丙酚
萧条(经济学)
麻醉
蒙特利尔认知评估
心理学
重性抑郁障碍
麻醉剂
认知
医学
不利影响
精神科
内科学
认知障碍
经济
宏观经济学
作者
Léo Bernardoff,Martin Blay,Dimitri Thellier,Thierry d’Amato,Filipe Galvão,Emmanuel Poulet
出处
期刊:Journal of Ect
[Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
日期:2025-02-17
标识
DOI:10.1097/yct.0000000000001119
摘要
Introduction Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in patients with treatment-resistant depression frequently leads to impairments in global cognitive function. Propofol and etomidate are the 2 most frequently used drugs for anesthetic induction during ECT. However, only few studies compared their differential impact on ECT-related impairments in global cognitive function. Methods We studied retrospectively 75 patients hospitalized at Centre Hospitalier Le Vinatier (Bron, France) who met the DSM-V criteria for major depressive disorder and were treated with bilateral ECT to compare the effects of propofol and etomidate on ECT-related cognitive impairment. Global cognitive function was assessed with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and symptom severity was assessed using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), both before and after treatment. The primary endpoint of the study was the change in MoCA score. Results We found no significant difference in MoCA score variation between the etomidate and propofol groups. There were also no significant differences in MADRS score variation, responder, remission rate or ECT parameters between the 2 groups (except duration of electroencephalogram crisis). Conclusions In this retrospective study, choice of etomidate or propofol as anesthetic agent had no impact on the adverse effects associated with ECT on global cognitive function in patients with treatment-resistant depression.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI