Tenderness in meat and meat alternatives: Structural and processing fundamentals

Abstract The demand for meat alternatives based on ingredients sourced from nonanimal materials with equivalent quality of muscle tissue is increasing. As more consumers switch to meat alternatives, a growing body of research has investigated the tenderness and related texture attributes in plant‐based meats to increase consumer acceptance. A deeper understanding of tenderness including the differences and similarities between meat and meat alternatives is crucial to developing products that meet consumer expectations, as it directly influences consumer acceptance. Meat tenderness is commonly quantified using sensory evaluation and instrumental tests and is influenced by various factors such as the intrinsic features of the animal before the slaughter, naturally occurring proteolysis during the post‐slaughter process, and several tenderization techniques. In contrast, meat alternative tenderness can be actively tailored through the selection of ingredients and the operating conditions of the structuring process. Especially, extrusion parameters such as moisture content and barrel temperature can greatly modulate tenderness‐related attributes. Postprocessing methods that have traditionally been utilized for tenderizing have also been applied to meat alternatives, but more studies are needed to fully reveal the underlying mechanisms. This review offers an overview and critical discussion on tenderness, covering the structural origins, influencing factors, analytical methods, oral processing, and tenderization processes for both meat and meat alternatives. The discussion is based on the existing knowledge of muscle tissue, which evolves to critically reviewing how this understanding can be applied to the textural attributes of meat alternatives and what kind of novel tenderization techniques can be developed for these new sustainable food products.