The Scope of Nurses' Assessment of Deteriorating Patients in Coronary Care Units: A Mixed Methods Study

范围(计算机科学) 医学 执业范围 判断 护理部 渐晕 医疗保健 心理学 政治学 计算机科学 经济增长 社会心理学 经济 程序设计语言 法学
作者
Nicholas Woolfe Loftus,Duncan Smith,Leanne M. Aitken
出处
期刊:Journal of Clinical Nursing [Wiley]
标识
DOI:10.1111/jocn.17500
摘要

ABSTRACT Background Despite the high acuity of coronary care unit (CCU) patients and their risk of deterioration, little is known about how nurses assess them. Aim Increase understanding of the scope of nurses' assessments of deteriorating CCU patients. Design Online mixed methods survey. Methods The mRAPIDS (modified Rescuing a Patient in Deteriorating Situations) tool was used to measure assessment scope in responses to a patient vignette with a higher mRAPID score signalling broader scope (maximum score 24). Reflections on day‐to‐day practice were collected concurrently and thematically analysed. Themes were integrated with scores using a joint display table and organised into domains. Comparing ‘fit’ between data showed expansion (overlap with broader nonoverlapping findings) and disconcordance (contradictory findings). Results Thirty‐four nurses responded, and scope of assessment was found to be narrow (median mRAPIDS 5). Two domains were identified that helped explain this finding ‘the act of assessment’ and ‘education and experience’. Participants emphasised the importance of education and experience, neither increased assessment scope. Conclusion This study showed that participant assessments were generally narrower than widely accepted best practice (ABCDE assessment). Implications Participant assessments did not reflect gold standard A‐E assessment, which may partly reflect a need for assessment frameworks that are more compatible with real‐world practice. Further research is required to understand the role of healthcare assistants in the care of deteriorating CCU patients. Clinical judgement is important, but not yet well understood in rapid response systems. Impact This study offers preliminary understanding of nurses' assessments of deteriorating patients in CCUs. Reporting Method American Psychological Association, Mixed Methods Standards. Patient or Public Contribution Reviewed protocol, aided result interpretation and shared ideas for future research.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
晓晓完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
TCR完成签到,获得积分0
1秒前
whuyyz完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
aajhajkahna应助稳重傲柔采纳,获得10
1秒前
轩轩发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
hmj完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
英吉利25发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
温暖的凤妖完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
欣慰雪巧完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
阿巴阿巴发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
晓桦完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
CodeCraft应助宋佳采纳,获得10
2秒前
取什么名字好呢完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
DEUX完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
跳跃西装发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
忧郁平文完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
负数完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
qumingzihaonan完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
5秒前
water完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
阿巴阿巴发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
飞天猪完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
YK发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
简单一江完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
jstagey完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
外向的电话完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
lilmacy发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
bbabb完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
南北有齐了不起完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
小黄完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
田様应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Principles of town planning: translating concepts to applications 1000
2016 Venous Blood Study (VBS) (Final V3.0) 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
从技术问题到科学问题:国家自然科学基金申请书写作指南 500
The Effective Clinical Neurologist 3ed 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7700687
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9260034
关于积分的说明 20022530
捐赠科研通 7276362
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3293729
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2449395
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2300326