医学
放射科
锁骨上淋巴结
淋巴
食管癌
细针穿刺
淋巴结
内镜超声
前瞻性队列研究
癌症
食管
活检
转移
外科
内科学
病理
作者
Evelyn P.M. van Vliet,Aad van der Lugt,Ernst J. Kuipers,Hugo W. Tilanus,Ate van der Gaast,John J. Hermans,Peter D. Siersema
摘要
Abstract Background and Objectives Both ultrasound (US) and computed tomography (CT) can be used to detect supraclavicular lymph node metastases. Aim was to compare US, US plus fine‐needle aspiration (US‐FNA), CT, US + CT, and US‐FNA + CT for the detection of these metastases in esophageal or gastric cardia cancer patients. Methods Between 1994 and 2004, 567 patients underwent US and CT for esophageal or gastric cardia cancer staging. Gold standard was postoperative detection of lymph nodes in the resected specimen, FNA, or a radiological result with follow‐up. Results Sensitivities of US (75%), US‐FNA (72%), US + CT (80%), and US‐FNA + CT (79%) were higher than sensitivity of CT alone (25%) ( P < 0.001). Specificities were high for US‐FNA (100%), CT (99%), and US‐FNA + CT (99%), whereas those of US alone (91%) and US + CT (91%) were lower ( P < 0.001). In 4/65 (6%) patients with true‐positive malignant lymph nodes, CT was positive with US and/or US‐FNA being negative. However, in 36/65 (55%) patients, US and/or US‐FNA were positive with CT being negative. Conclusion US‐FNA seems the preferred diagnostic modality for the detection of supraclavicular lymph node metastases in patients with esophageal or gastric cardia cancer. Sensitivity of metastases detection only slightly improves if US‐FNA is combined with CT. A prospective, comparative study is however needed. J. Surg. Oncol. 2007;96: 200–206. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI