医学
复苏
科克伦图书馆
失血性休克
随机对照试验
重症监护医学
荟萃分析
休克(循环)
临床试验
创伤性休克
梅德林
急诊医学
外科
内科学
政治学
法学
作者
Hua Wang,Mao-bing Chen,Xuwen Zheng,Qi-han Zheng
出处
期刊:Medicine
[Wolters Kluwer]
日期:2019-11-01
卷期号:98 (48): e18145-e18145
被引量:7
标识
DOI:10.1097/md.0000000000018145
摘要
Hypotensive resuscitation is an old study. But its benefits and losses are still controversial. In clinic, the method of fluid resuscitation needs more reliable experimental evidence. This study's objective is to systematically evaluate the efficacy of hypotensive resuscitation in patients with traumatic hemorrhagic shock.Through October 2019, Web of Science, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Clinical Trials will be systematically searched to identify randomized controlled trials exploring the efficacy of hypotensive resuscitation in traumatic hemorrhagic shock. Strict screening and quality evaluation will be independently performed on the obtained literature by 2 researchers; outcome indexes will be extracted, and a meta-analysis will be performed on the data using Revman 5.3 software.The stronger evidence about the efficacy of hypotensive resuscitation in traumatic hemorrhagic shock will be provided for clinicians.PROSPERO CRD42019133169.This study is not only a simple combination of data, but also to verify and discuss the reliability of the results, and provide more convincing evidence for clinicians.Firstly, according to the previous literature researching, it is found that the number of relevant randomized controlled trials is small and the quality level of the literature is uneven. Secondly, the efficacy of hypotensive resuscitation is discussed for a long time, different trials may take place at different times. Comparability between different trials is reduced.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI