已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整的填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

The Characteristics and Ethics of Sham Surgeries

医学 临床试验 假手术 梅德林 随机对照试验 外科 普通外科 替代医学 内科学 病理 政治学 法学
作者
Peter T Hetzler,Lauren E. Berger,Samuel S. Huffman,Margaret Lee,Ryan Park,David Song,Lydia S. Dugdale
出处
期刊:Annals of Surgery [Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
卷期号:278 (2): 153-158 被引量:5
标识
DOI:10.1097/sla.0000000000005882
摘要

We sought to perform a large-scale systematic review across all sham-controlled studies currently present in the literature to better characterize the ethical considerations of these studies.Innovative surgical procedures are often introduced into the clinical setting without the robust clinical trials required for medicinal treatments. Sham surgeries serve as placebos by performing all steps of a surgical intervention aside from those deemed therapeutically necessary. Yet, sham trials are underutilized because of ethical controversy.Ovid MEDLINE was queried through April 2022 with combinations of the Medical Subject (MeSH) headings and keywords including, but not limited to, "surgery," "endoscopy," "randomized controlled trial," and "sham procedure." Primary outcomes were surgical indications and characteristics, outcome measurements, and whether the investigational treatment was offered to the sham cohort.One hundred seventy-two articles fit our inclusion criteria, with gastrointestinal pathologies being the most common surgical indication. Participants, personnel, and outcome assessment were all blinded in 8.7% of trials (n=15). Study populations included adult subjects (age ≥18) in 170 studies (98.8%), and two involved children. The most common level of dissection and type of anesthesia were deep (n=66, 38.4%) and general (n=49, 28.5%), respectively. An open surgical approach was utilized in 20.9% of studies (n=36). Primary outcomes were objective in 75 studies (43.6%) and subjective in 97 (56.4%), 62 of which used validated outcome measures (36.0%). Four trials explicitly did not offer the surgery to the sham arm (2.3%), whereas 106 had no mention of whether the intervention was offered (61.6%).Our systematic review of 172 randomized, sham-controlled trials highlights the ethical considerations that must be considered in these studies, namely the importance of transparent study design and objective outcome reporting, the difficulty of informed consent, and the inherent risks associated with surgical interventions.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
月亮发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
Ji发布了新的文献求助30
3秒前
7秒前
囚徒完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
冷傲问芙完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
从容芮应助CC采纳,获得30
10秒前
田様应助风zcf采纳,获得10
11秒前
stay完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
zxer完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
14秒前
红泥小火炉完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
秋雪瑶应助鹿鹿采纳,获得10
22秒前
沉静的怜蕾完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
若水完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
30秒前
活力的妙之完成签到 ,获得积分10
32秒前
小王完成签到 ,获得积分10
37秒前
40秒前
47秒前
淡定夏云完成签到 ,获得积分10
49秒前
50秒前
小米稀饭完成签到 ,获得积分10
51秒前
奥特超曼应助heed采纳,获得10
51秒前
54秒前
orixero应助蒋丞丞采纳,获得10
56秒前
科研通AI2S应助荔枝圆滚滚采纳,获得10
57秒前
zxer发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
希望天下0贩的0应助zxer采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
蒋丞丞发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
fineloby发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
研友_8KKeb8关注了科研通微信公众号
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
星辰大海应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
斯文败类应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
高分求助中
Sustainable Land Management: Strategies to Cope with the Marginalisation of Agriculture 1000
Corrosion and Oxygen Control 600
Yaws' Handbook of Antoine coefficients for vapor pressure 500
Python Programming for Linguistics and Digital Humanities: Applications for Text-Focused Fields 500
Love and Friendship in the Western Tradition: From Plato to Postmodernity 500
行動データの計算論モデリング 強化学習モデルを例として 500
Johann Gottlieb Fichte: Die späten wissenschaftlichen Vorlesungen / IV,1: ›Transzendentale Logik I (1812)‹ 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 有机化学 工程类 生物化学 纳米技术 物理 内科学 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 电极 光电子学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2556332
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2180191
关于积分的说明 5623211
捐赠科研通 1901556
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 949913
版权声明 565607
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 504832