法庭
荣誉
佣金
工作(物理)
大陆架
法学
政治学
联合国海洋法公约
国际法
海洋学
工程类
地质学
计算机科学
机械工程
操作系统
标识
DOI:10.1080/00908320.2024.2413603
摘要
In the Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission Advisory Opinion, the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea confirmed it possessed the jurisdiction to deliver an advisory opinion upon the request of as few as two states. This essay considers what this might mean, as the implications of this jurisdiction are significant, in terms of both the law of the sea generally, and the potential impact for the operation of the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf. These implications were magnified after the decision in Mauritius-Maldives Maritime Boundary Case (Preliminary Objections) which considered the status of an advisory opinion.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI