Biodegradation of differently cross‐linked collagen membranes: an experimental study in the rat

Abstract: The aim of the present study was to compare the biodegradation of differently cross‐linked collagen membranes in rats. Five commercially available and three experimental membranes (VN) were included: (1) BioGide ® (BG) (non‐cross‐linked porcine type I and III collagens), (2) BioMend ® (BM), (3) BioMendExtend ® (BME) (glutaraldehyde cross‐linked bovine type I collagen), (4) Ossix ® (OS) (enzymatic‐cross‐linked bovine type I collagen), (5) TutoDent ® (TD) (non‐cross‐linked bovine type I collagen, and (6–8) VN(1–3) (chemical cross‐linked porcine type I and III collagens). Specimens were randomly allocated in unconnected subcutaneous pouches separated surgically on the back of 40 wistar rats, which were divided into five groups (2, 4, 8, 16, and 24 weeks), including eight animals each. After 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24 weeks of healing, the rats were sacrificed and explanted specimens were prepared for histologic and histometric analysis. The following parameters were evaluated: biodegradation over time, vascularization, tissue integration, and foreign body reaction. Highest vascularization and tissue integration was noted for BG followed by BM, BME, and VN(1); TD, VN(2), and VN(3) showed prolongated, while OS exhibited no vascularization. Subsequently, biodegradation of BG, BM, BME and VN(1) was faster than TD, VN(2), and VN(3). OS showed only a minute amount of superficial biodegradation 24 weeks following implantation. Biodegradation of TD, BM, BME, VN(2), and VN(3) was associated with the presence of inflammatory cells. Within the limits of the present study, it was concluded that cross‐linking of bovine and porcine‐derived collagen types I and III was associated with (i) prolonged biodegradation, (ii) decreased tissue integration and vascularization, and (iii) in case of TD, BM, BME, VN(2), and VN(3) foreign body reactions.