分类
专题地图
感知
意义(存在)
语义学(计算机科学)
对比度(视觉)
对象(语法)
视觉处理
计算机科学
认知心理学
自然语言处理
心理学
人工智能
地图学
地理
神经科学
程序设计语言
心理治疗师
作者
Joseph C. Nah,Joy J. Geng
标识
DOI:10.31234/osf.io/6u3sn
摘要
Studies of visual object processing have long appreciated that semantic meaning is automatically extracted. However, “semantics” has largely been defined as a unitary concept that describes all meaning-based information. In contrast, the concept literature divides semantics into taxonomic and thematic types. Taxonomic relationships reflect categorization by similarities (e.g., dog – wolf); thematic groups are based on complementary relationships (e.g., swimsuit – goggles). Critically, thematic relationships are learned from the experienced co-occurrence of objects whereas taxonomic relationships are based on shared structural similarities. In two studies with adults (N=66 Experiment 1; N=44 Experiment 2), we test whether visual processing of thematic objects is more rapid because they form a perceptual unit and serve as mutual visual primes. The results demonstrate that visual processing benefits between thematically related objects are earlier than taxonomic ones, revealing a link between how information is acquired (e.g., experienced vs. unobserved) and how it modulates perception.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI