High-dose methotrexate with or without whole brain radiotherapy for primary CNS lymphoma (G-PCNSL-SG-1): a phase 3, randomised, non-inferiority trial

医学 放射治疗 甲氨蝶呤 原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤 化疗 养生 化疗方案 肿瘤科 内科学 外科
作者
Eckhard Thiel,Agnieszka Korfel,Peter Martus,Lothar Kanz,Frank Griesinger,Michael Rauch,Alexander Röth,Bernd Hertenstein,Theda von Toll,Thomas Hundsberger,H.‐G. Mergenthaler,Malte Leithäuser,Tobias Birnbaum,Lars Fischer,Kristoph Jahnke,Ulrich Herrlinger,Ludwig Plaßwilm,Thomas Nägele,Torsten Pietsch,Michael Bamberg
出处
期刊:Lancet Oncology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:11 (11): 1036-1047 被引量:607
标识
DOI:10.1016/s1470-2045(10)70229-1
摘要

Background High-dose methotrexate is the standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma. The role of whole brain radiotherapy is controversial because delayed neurotoxicity limits its acceptance as a standard of care. We aimed to investigate whether first-line chemotherapy based on high-dose methotrexate was non-inferior to the same chemotherapy regimen followed by whole brain radiotherapy for overall survival. Methods Immunocompetent patients with newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma were enrolled from 75 centres and treated between May, 2000, and May, 2009. Patients were allocated by computer-generated block randomisation to receive first-line chemotherapy based on high-dose methotrexate with or without subsequent whole brain radiotherapy, with stratification by age (<60 vs ≥60 years) and institution (Berlin vs Tübingen vs all other sites). The biostatistics centre assigned patients to treatment groups and informed local centres by fax; physicians and patients were not masked to treatment group after assignment. Patients enrolled between May, 2000, and August, 2006, received high-dose methotrexate (4 g/m2) on day 1 of six 14-day cycles; thereafter, patients received high-dose methotrexate plus ifosfamide (1·5 g/m2) on days 3–5 of six 14-day cycles. In those assigned to receive first-line chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy, whole brain radiotherapy was given to a total dose of 45 Gy, in 30 fractions of 1·5 Gy given daily on weekdays. Patients allocated to first-line chemotherapy without whole brain radiotherapy who had not achieved complete response were given high-dose cytarabine. The primary endpoint was overall survival, and analysis was per protocol. Our hypothesis was that the omission of whole brain radiotherapy does not compromise overall survival, with a non-inferiority margin of 0·9. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00153530. Findings 551 patients (median age 63 years, IQR 55–69) were enrolled and randomised, of whom 318 were treated per protocol. In the per-protocol population, median overall survival was 32·4 months (95% CI 25·8–39·0) in patients receiving whole brain radiotherapy (n=154), and 37·1 months (27·5–46·7) in those not receiving whole brain radiotherapy (n=164), hazard ratio 1·06 (95% CI 0·80–1·40; p=0·71). Thus our primary hypothesis was not proven. Median progression-free survival was 18·3 months (95% CI 11·6–25·0) in patients receiving whole brain radiotherapy, and 11·9 months (7·3–16·5; p=0·14) in those not receiving whole brain radiotherapy. Treatment-related neurotoxicity in patients with sustained complete response was more common in patients receiving whole brain radiotherapy (22/45, 49% by clinical assessment; 35/49, 71% by neuroradiology) than in those who did not (9/34, 26%; 16/35, 46%). Interpretation No significant difference in overall survival was recorded when whole brain radiotherapy was omitted from first-line chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma, but our primary hypothesis was not proven. The progression-free survival benefit afforded by whole brain radiotherapy has to be weighed against the increased risk of neurotoxicity in long-term survivors. Funding German Cancer Aid.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
欧克完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
ALBERT发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
小琪猪完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
Claire完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
MM发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
在水一方应助111采纳,获得20
5秒前
麻花精发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
研友_84mk0L完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
sunki发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
飞远完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
秋菲菲发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
隐形曼青应助东东q东东采纳,获得30
8秒前
怡然的乘风完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
俏皮的芒果完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
夫茶饮完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
3237924531完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
Nole应助努力心采纳,获得10
9秒前
orixero应助Wo了喝采纳,获得10
9秒前
优秀的dd发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
Nano完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
欧克关注了科研通微信公众号
10秒前
巫文鑫发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
Raymond完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
MOMO发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
xhh完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
彼之鸩羽完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
YaaCiao发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
小龙发布了新的文献求助30
12秒前
12秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The anomeric effect 1000
Principles of town planning: translating concepts to applications 1000
Navigating Normative Orders: Interdisciplinary Perspectives 750
1 Peter and Christ's Descent to the Dead in Its Early Christian Reception 700
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7734049
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9284492
关于积分的说明 20165455
捐赠科研通 7311875
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3304563
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2457166
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2313743