心理学
遗忘
召回
动机遗忘
提取诱导遗忘
元认知
认知心理学
过度自信效应
背景(考古学)
控制(管理)
元记忆
召回测试
免费召回
词(群论)
社会心理学
认知
语言学
人工智能
计算机科学
生物
哲学
古生物学
神经科学
作者
Michael C. Friedman,Alan D. Castel
出处
期刊:Memory & Cognition
[Springer Science+Business Media]
日期:2011-06-03
卷期号:39 (8): 1448-1456
被引量:37
标识
DOI:10.3758/s13421-011-0115-y
摘要
It is often important to accurately predict not only what information we will later remember, but also what information we are likely to forget. The present research examined these abilities in the context of item-method directed forgetting, to determine whether people are aware of their strategic control of remembering and forgetting, as well as what cues are used when making metacognitive judgments. Participants studied words, each of which was followed by a cue to remember (R) or forget (F) the word for an upcoming test, and also made predictions of how likely they would be to later recall each word. When asked to recall all of the words, regardless of cue, both recall and predicted recall were fairly sensitive to the R or F instructions, despite some overconfidence. A similar and stronger pattern was found when words were assigned positive or negative point values as cues to remember or forget. These findings suggest that item-based cues to remember or forget information can be successfully utilized when making metacognitive judgments, and that people are fairly aware of the control they have over both remembering and forgetting information.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI