Desvenlafaxine 50 and 100 mg/d in the treatment of major depressive disorder: An 8-week, phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial and a post hoc pooled analysis of three studies

医学 析因分析 双盲 安慰剂 事后 重性抑郁障碍 内科学 精神科 病理 替代医学 扁桃形结构
作者
Karen A. Tourian,S. Krishna Padmanabhan,James Groark,Claudine Brisard,D. L. Farrington
出处
期刊:Clinical Therapeutics [Elsevier]
卷期号:31: 1405-1423 被引量:62
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.07.006
摘要

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common, chronic illness associated with substantial disability and economic burden. Although a number of effective antidepressants are available, the need for new medications that are effective and well tolerated remains.The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of fixed-dose desvenlafaxine 50 and 100 mg/d with placebo for MDD. A post hoc pooled analysis was conducted to evaluate this study in the context of all similarly designed, completed studies with the 2 doses.This was an 8-week, Phase III, randomized, double-blind, duloxetine-referenced, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial conducted in 21 centers across the United States. Duloxetine was included for assay sensitivity as a positive control; the study was not designed or powered to compare desvenlafaxine with duloxetine. Participants were outpatients aged > or =18 years with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition-defined MDD and a 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D(17)) score > or =20. Patients were randomly assigned at baseline to fixed-dose desvenlafaxine (50 or 100 mg/d), fixed-dose duloxetine (60 mg/d), or placebo. The primary outcome measure was HAM-D(17) total score at the final evaluation. Additional measures included the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) score, Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score, Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) score, and 6-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, Bech version (HAM-D(6)). Tolerability assessments included discontinuation rates, adverse events (AEs), vital signs, and laboratory tests. The post hoc pooled analysis was performed using data from the current study and 2 previously published, positive studies that compared the efficacy and tolerability of desvenlafaxine 50 and 100 mg/d with placebo for MDD. The design and methodologies of the 2 studies were similar to the methodology of the current trial, other than not including a reference compound.Of the 925 patients who were screened, 287 did not meet entry criteria, and 638 patients enrolled in the study; the intent-to-treat (ITT) population included 615 patients who were evaluated for efficacy (mean [SD] age range, 38.8-40.7 [12.1-13.2] years; mean weight range, 83.3-87.0 [22.8-23.9] kg; female sex, 398 [64.7%]; white race, 458 [74.5%]). The primary end point did not reach significance based on the global F test for controlling multiplicity of the desvenlafaxine doses. Based on pairwise comparison, significantly greater improvements on the HAM-D(17) were observed in the desven-lafaxine 100 mg/d (-10.5; P = 0.028, unadjusted for multiple comparisons) and duloxetine 60 mg/d groups (-10.3; P = 0.047) compared with placebo (-8.7). Desvenlafaxine 100 mg/d and duloxetine 60 mg/d were associated with significantly better scores compared with placebo on the CGI-I, MADRS, CGI-S, and HAM-D(6). No significant differences were observed in any scale between the desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d and placebo groups. Discontinuation rates due to AEs were 5%, 7%, 13%, and 6% for the desvenlafaxine 50-mg/d, desvenlafaxine 100-mg/d, duloxetine 60-mg/d, and placebo groups, respectively. The ITT population from all 3 studies in the pooled analysis consisted of 1388 patients (mean [SD] age range, 38.8-45.7 [12.1-12.6] years; mean weight range, 73.1-87.0 [17.6-23.9] kg; female sex, 896 [64.6%]; white race, 1136 [81.8%]). Significantly greater improvements on the HAM-D(17) were observed for desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d (-11.5; P < 0.001) and 100 mg/d (-11.8; P < 0.001) versus placebo (-9.6). Both doses were significantly better than placebo on the CGI-I, MADRS, and HAM-D(6).The current study failed to meet its primary efficacy end point based on the a priori analysis plan. Desvenlafaxine was generally well tolerated. A post hoc pooled analysis of this trial and 2 previously published trials with both desvenlafaxine 50 and 100 mg/d found both doses to be effective for MDD compared with placebo. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: 00384033.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
炒栗子完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
333发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
无花果应助文献搬运工采纳,获得10
18秒前
18秒前
上官完成签到,获得积分20
19秒前
天边的云彩完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
个性鲂发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
会谢完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
cctv18应助上官采纳,获得10
27秒前
66完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
28秒前
一步一脚印完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
伤感刘能发布了新的文献求助10
34秒前
Florenceeeee完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
个性鲂完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
FREE完成签到 ,获得积分10
36秒前
WoUHaai完成签到 ,获得积分10
40秒前
答辩完成签到,获得积分10
41秒前
49秒前
尐宝.发布了新的文献求助10
49秒前
54秒前
Mia完成签到 ,获得积分10
56秒前
lingling完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
Xie完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
老王发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
好好学习应助小楠采纳,获得10
1分钟前
yuki发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
在望完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
许nana完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
Eason Liu完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
彭于晏应助万事顺利采纳,获得10
1分钟前
IMxYang应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
小蘑菇应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
高分求助中
Teaching Social and Emotional Learning in Physical Education 900
Plesiosaur extinction cycles; events that mark the beginning, middle and end of the Cretaceous 800
Recherches Ethnographiques sue les Yao dans la Chine du Sud 500
Two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis reveals causal relationships between blood lipids and venous thromboembolism 500
Chinese-English Translation Lexicon Version 3.0 500
Wisdom, Gods and Literature Studies in Assyriology in Honour of W. G. Lambert 400
薩提亞模式團體方案對青年情侶輔導效果之研究 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 有机化学 工程类 生物化学 纳米技术 物理 内科学 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 电极 光电子学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2392553
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2097021
关于积分的说明 5283626
捐赠科研通 1824608
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 909959
版权声明 559943
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 486276