危险系数
医学
置信区间
乳腺癌
肿瘤科
内科学
比例危险模型
不利影响
佐剂
癌症
作者
Matthew P. Goetz,İrfan Çiçin,Laura Testa,Sara M. Tolaney,Jens Huober,Valentina Guarneri,Stephen Johnston,Miguel Martín,Priya Rastogi,Nadia Harbeck,Ashwin Shahir,Ran Wei,Valérie André,Hope S. Rugo,Joyce O’Shaughnessy
标识
DOI:10.1038/s41523-024-00639-1
摘要
Abstract In monarchE, adjuvant abemaciclib significantly improved invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and distant relapse-free survival (DRFS), with sustained benefit beyond the 2-year treatment period. Abemaciclib dose reductions were allowed to proactively manage adverse events. Exploratory analyses to investigate the impact of dose reductions on efficacy were conducted. Across the three patient subgroups as defined by relative dose intensity (≤66%, 66–93%, ≥93%), the estimated 4-year IDFS rates were generally consistent (87.1%, 86.4%, and 83.7%, respectively). In the time-dependent Cox proportional hazard model, the effect of abemaciclib was consistent at the full dose compared to being reduced to a lower dose (IDFS hazard ratio: 0.905; 95% confidence interval: 0.727, 1.125; DRFS hazard ratio: 0.942; 95% confidence interval: 0.742, 1.195). These analyses showed that the efficacy of adjuvant abemaciclib was not compromised by protocol mandated dose reductions for patients with node positive, hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor 2-negative, high-risk early breast cancer.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI