医学
急诊分诊台
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
急性冠脉综合征
传统PCI
急诊医学
队列
临床终点
弗雷明翰风险评分
内科学
心脏病学
心肌梗塞
随机对照试验
疾病
作者
Jesse P A Demandt,Arjan Koks,Dennis Sagel,Veerle A. E. van Hattem,Rutger J Haest,Eric Heijmen,H.O.M. Thijssen,Luuk Otterspoor,Dennis van Veghel,Rob Eerdekens,Mohamed El Farissi,Koen Teeuwen,Inge Wijnbergen,Pim van der Harst,Nico H.J. Pijls,Marcel van ‘t Veer,Pim A.L. Tonino,Henk L. Dekker,Pieter J. Vlaar
出处
期刊:Heart
[BMJ]
日期:2023-12-01
卷期号:110 (6): 408-415
被引量:6
标识
DOI:10.1136/heartjnl-2023-323346
摘要
Objective Prehospital risk stratification and triage are currently not performed in patients suspected of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). This may lead to prolonged time to revascularisation, increased duration of hospital admission and higher healthcare costs. The preHEART score (prehospital history, ECG, age, risk factors and point-of-care troponin score) can be used by emergency medical services (EMS) personnel for prehospital risk stratification and triage decisions in patients with NSTE-ACS. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the effect of prehospital risk stratification and direct transfer to a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) centre, based on the preHEART score, on time to final invasive diagnostics or culprit revascularisation. Methods Prospective, multicentre, two-cohort study in patients with suspected NSTE-ACS. The first cohort is observational (standard care), while the second (interventional) cohort includes patients who are stratified for direct transfer to either a PCI or a non-PCI centre based on their preHEART score. Risk stratification and triage are performed by EMS personnel. The primary endpoint of the study is time from first medical contact until final invasive diagnostics or revascularisation. Secondary endpoints are time from first medical contact until intracoronary angiography (ICA), duration of hospital admission, number of invasive diagnostics, number of inter-hospital transfers and major adverse cardiac events at 7 and 30 days. Results A total of 1069 patients were included. In the interventional cohort (n=577), time between final invasive diagnostics or revascularisation (42 (17–101) hours vs 20 (5–44) hours, p<0.001) and length of hospital admission (3 (2–5) days vs 2 (1–4) days, p=0.007) were shorter than in the observational cohort (n=492). In patients with NSTE-ACS in need for ICA or revascularisation, healthcare costs were reduced in the interventional cohort (€5599 (2978–9625) vs €4899 (2278–5947), p=0.02). Conclusion Prehospital risk stratification and direct transfer to a PCI centre, based on the preHEART score, reduces time from first medical contact to final invasive diagnostics and revascularisation, reduces duration of hospital admission and decreases healthcare costs in patients with NSTE-ACS in need for ICA or revascularisation. Trial registration NCT05243485 .
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI