医学
雷公藤
阿达木单抗
类风湿性关节炎
内科学
随机对照试验
不利影响
甲氨蝶呤
临床终点
雷公藤
临床试验
关节炎
胃肠病学
化学
替代医学
有机化学
病理
糖苷
作者
Feng Luo,Shuo‐Yan Gau,Yu‐xia Wu,Hou‐li Liao,Fang Tang,Qin Zhong,Ying Huang,Lei Hou,Zheng‐qi Liu,Jin‐long Cai,Yue‐peng Cao,Daomin Lu,Yang An,Weiya Lan,Can Liu,Changming Chen,Ertao Jia,Xueming Yao,James Cheng‐Chung Wei,Wukai Ma
标识
DOI:10.1111/1756-185x.15031
摘要
Abstract Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adalimumab (ADA) combined with Tripterygium wilfordii Hook F (TwHF) in the treatment of methotrexate (MTX)‐inadequate response patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods In this multicenter, open‐label, randomized controlled clinical trial, 64 RA patients with inadequate response to MTX were 1:1 randomly assigned into treatment or control groups. The treatment group was treated with ADA in combination with TwHF, and the control group was treated with ADA in combination with MTX for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients having low disease activity (2.6 ≤ DAS28‐ESR < 3.2) and remission rates (DAS28‐ESR < 2.6) at week 24. Results In total, 53 of the 64 patients (82.8%) completed this 24‐week clinical trial. By intent‐to‐treat (ITT) analysis, a comparable outcome was observed between the two groups. The percentage of patients achieving low disease activity in the treatment group and control group were 43.8% and 46.9% (95% CI, 21.28 to 27.48, p = .802). Percentage of patients achieving low disease activity rates were respectively 28.1% and 31.3% in the treatment group and control group (95% CI, 19.18 to 25.58, p = .784). In per‐protocol (PP) analysis, the results were consistent with the ITT model. The incidence of adverse events was comparable between the two groups. Conclusions There were no significant differences in efficacy and safety between ADA combined with TwHF versus ADA combined with MTX in the treatment of RA. TwHF might be an alternative treatment for RA patients who are intolerant to MTX.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI