Assessing the Landscape of Quality Care Nursing Metrics in General Practice Settings: A Scoping Review

奇纳 护理部 护理结果分类 术语 灰色文学 医学 梅德林 数据提取 背景(考古学) 质量(理念) 系统回顾 心理学 护士教育 初级护理 心理干预 哲学 法学 古生物学 认识论 生物 语言学 政治学
作者
Orla Loftus Moran,Mary Casey
出处
期刊:Journal of Advanced Nursing [Wiley]
标识
DOI:10.1111/jan.17008
摘要

ABSTRACT Aim To synthesise current evidence on the development and implementation of quality care metrics for nurses working in general practice. Design A Scoping review guided by Arksey and O'Malley's framework and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analysis for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA‐ScR). Method Articles included peer‐reviewed primary research, published in English between 1989 and 2024, reporting on the development, implementation and evaluation of quality care nursing metrics in general practice settings. EndNote was used for citation management, while Covidence facilitated screening and data extraction by four reviewers. The Donabedian model of quality care assessment (2005) and the WHO tool for primary care nurse competencies (2020) were used to synthesise the findings. Data Sources A systematic search of PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE and Web of Science databases was conducted between June 2022 and June 2024. The search strategy was developed using Population, Concept and Context criteria, with keywords including ‘Nurse’, ‘General Practice’, ‘Metric’ and ‘Indicator.’ Results Eleven studies conducted between 2005 and 2024 met the inclusion criteria. Five studies focused on quality care indicators or measures, and six examined nurse competencies or standards of care. Conclusion Quality care metrics are underutilised in general practice. There is ambiguity in metric terminology and nursing roles, education and primary care systems. Quality care metrics must align with nursing values, with digital technology and leadership as core enablers. Implications for the Profession and/or Patient Care Adoption of nursing metrics in general practice provides insights into nursing contributions to patient care. Standardising the definitions of nursing care metrics will enable valid and reliable comparisons. Impact Quality care nursing metrics will enable the nurse's role to be manifested in general practice settings in relation to patient outcomes. Reporting Method PRISMA reporting guidelines have been adhered to. What Does This Paper Contribute to the Wider Global Clinical Community? Understanding of the role of the nurse in general practice will support improved quality, safety, policy and governance in general practice settings. Patient or Public Contribution No patient or public contribution.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
kossiyyh发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
汪进辉_Will完成签到,获得积分20
刚刚
刚刚
xing_xing应助后知后觉采纳,获得20
1秒前
有一套发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
melina完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
wanci应助小冯1采纳,获得10
2秒前
yz应助cc采纳,获得10
2秒前
Yau发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
BOOOLUUU发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
七院发布了新的文献求助50
2秒前
天天快乐应助lili采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
嗯哦吧啦完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
少卿发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
linan发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
Yasong发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
可爱的函函应助lgs1采纳,获得10
4秒前
qiaoj2006发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
田様应助lixiaobai采纳,获得10
5秒前
千初完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
xiaoming完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
阿巴阿巴阿巴完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
脑洞疼应助有一套采纳,获得10
6秒前
果冻发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
liujiajun发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
奋斗灵珊发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
Calla_ran完成签到,获得积分20
9秒前
科研通AI2S应助Sylvia采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
耍酷寒烟应助畅快自行车采纳,获得10
9秒前
10秒前
妮妮完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
华仔应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
10秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Principles of town planning: translating concepts to applications 1000
Cognitive Psychology in a Changing World 800
内視鏡的に摘除しえた十二指腸乳頭部腫瘍の2例 660
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
The Neuroscience of Language 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7684627
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9248117
关于积分的说明 19950992
捐赠科研通 7257536
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3288865
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2446044
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2292986