医学
心脏移植物血管病
心脏病学
危险分层
心肌灌注成像
血流
内科学
灌注
心脏移植
正电子发射断层摄影术
移植
冠状动脉血流储备
冠状动脉循环
心脏宠物
灌注扫描
定量评估
放射科
门控心肌显像
血管造影
核医学
Spect成像
代理终结点
冠状动脉疾病
肺移植
冠状动脉造影
血流动力学
冠状动脉
心力衰竭
接收机工作特性
压力测试(软件)
肺
标准摄取值
单光子发射计算机断层摄影术
试验预测值
循环系统
风险评估
负荷超声心动图
作者
Paul Hart,Anas Jawaid,Jeffrey Fitch,Natalia Paone Aerton,Erin Armenia,Maria Mackin,Sneha Limaye,S Avino,Paul Blasio,Dillon J. Dzikowicz,Paco E. Bravo,Leway Chen,Ronald G. Schwartz
标识
DOI:10.1161/circimaging.126.019747
摘要
BACKGROUND: Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality after orthotopic heart transplantation. Although positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging with quantitative myocardial blood flow (MBF) effectively detects CAV, access remains limited. Cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT) single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) enables quantitative MBF assessment and may provide a more accessible alternative. However, the diagnostic and prognostic value of quantitative CZT SPECT-derived MBF for CAV is unknown. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 110 consecutive orthotopic heart transplantation recipients who underwent coronary angiography and CZT SPECT quantitative MBF imaging within 12 months. Stress MBF, rest MBF, MBF reserve, coronary flow capacity, and total perfusion deficit were compared across International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation CAV categories. The diagnostic performance of the established (Bravo) and modified (Hart) flow-based algorithms was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic analysis. Associations with CAV-related events were assessed. RESULTS: Over 2.3±1.0 years, stress MBF declined progressively with increasing CAV severity ( P =0.007) and was lower in patients with CAV 2 to 3 than in those with CAV 0 to 1 (1.25±0.52 versus 2.03±0.81 mL/min per g; P =0.003). The Bravo and Hart algorithms showed similar discrimination of advanced CAV by paired DeLong comparison (area under the curve, 0.773 versus 0.717; Δ area under the curve, 0.056; P =0.606). Severely reduced coronary flow capacity was associated with higher event rates (28.6% versus 5.2%; P =0.015). The Hart framework demonstrated exploratory prognostic separation (35.3% versus 3.2%; P =0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative CZT SPECT-derived MBF and coronary flow capacity provide physiological assessment and risk stratification of CAV, with preliminary associations with CAV-related events. These findings support the prospective multicenter evaluation of CZT SPECT MBF as a widely available, noninvasive orthotopic heart transplantation surveillance strategy.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI