医学
麻醉
臂丛神经阻滞
围手术期
不利影响
置信区间
类阿片
臂丛神经
优势比
随机对照试验
外科
芬太尼
疼痛控制
术后疼痛
临床试验
神经阻滞
低风险
吗啡
并发症
疼痛管理
作者
Rafael Llombart‐Ais,María Benlloch,Gonzalo Mariscal,Pablo Vera,Egor Polevoi,Ali Dway,Carlos Barrios,Rafael Llombart-Ais
摘要
Introduction: This meta-analysis investigated differences in rebound pain and opioid consumption when using brachial plexus block (BPB) versus general anesthesia (GA) for upper limb surgery. Methods: Four databases were searched. Odds ratios (OR), mean differences (MD), and standard mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Outcomes included were pain, opioid consumption, adverse events, and discharge time. Risk of bias was assessed. Results: Nine Clinical Trials involving 487 patients were included. BPB resulted in significantly lower pain scores within 2 hours postoperatively (MD-4.57, 95%CI-5.76 to 3.38; participants=263; studies=5; I2=0%; p<0.00001) but not from 6-24 hours. Opioid consumption (mg) was lower in the BPB group in the first 24 hours (SMD-0.85, 95%CI-1.41 to -0.29; participants=188; studies=3; I2=67%; p<0.003). BPB was associated with fewer postoperative nausea/vomiting events (OR0.19, 95%CI0.10 to 0.33; participants=326; studies=6; I2=45%; p<0.00001) and shorter hospital stay (SMD-1.20, 95%CI-1.73 to -0.66; participants=213; studies=4; I2=69%; p<0.0001). There was no difference in number of patients not requiring opioids from 24-48 hours. Conclusions: BPB provided superior pain control at two hours postoperatively and was associated with reduced opioid use, fewer adverse events, and shorter discharge time. No significant differences in pain scores were observed at 6–24 hours or beyond 24 hours, likely due to block wear-off. Despite this limitation, BPB still offered perioperative advantages over GA.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI