Comparison of Macintosh laryngoscope and King Vision video laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation in adult patients

Background: Development of video laryngoscope has made management of airway easier. 0ur study was aimed to compare the efficacy of Macintosh laryngoscope and King Vision video laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation in adult patients under general anesthesia. Objectives: The primary objective of the study was to compare the glottic view obtained , the need for external manipulation, endotracheal tube insertion time and attempts taken for successful intubation with Macintosh laryngoscope and King Vision video laryngoscope. The secondary objective was to estimate the changes in hemodynamic parameters and to evaluate the occurrence of complications during intubation. Materials and Methods: The study included 136 patients posted for surgery under general anesthesia. Patients were randomly allocated in group C (N=68) and group V (N=68 ).Endotracheal intubation was done in group C by Macintosh and in group V by King Vision video laryngoscope. Laryngoscopy was assessed by Cormack Lehane grading and the need for any manipulation. The intubation time was calculated with each blade. Hemodynamic parameters were recorded and any complication during laryngoscopy and intubation were noted. The observations were analysed statistically by SPSS Program for windows version 28. Results: In group C, 61.8% of patients had Cormack and Lehane score I while in group V 76.5 % of patients had score I . Mean time of successful intubation was 34.90±8.35 sec in group C while in group V it was 32.82± 5.20 second . There was no statistical difference in distribution of patients according to number of attempts of intubation. In group C, 64.7% of patients needed external laryngeal pressure while in group V 97.1 % patients were intubated without external laryngeal pressure. Both the groups were comparable in relation to changes in hemodynamic parameters and any complications associated with laryngoscopy and intubation. Conclusion: We conclude that glottic view is better obtained with King Vision Video laryngoscope whereas optimisation of position and external laryngeal manipulation is often required with Macintosh laryngoscope to get similar glottic view. Introduction of King Vision video laryngoscope into the oral cavity takes time but intubation is easier with it. Hemodynamic variables and complications during the procedure are equally distributed between the two devices.