Comparison of Single Versus Multiple Nonpharmacological Interventions for the Management of Lung Cancer–Related Fatigue: A Systematic Review

作者
Audrey A. Almassi,Clarice Tang,Sheree Smith
出处
期刊:Clinical Respiratory Journal [Wiley]
卷期号:19 (10): e70132-e70132
标识
DOI:10.1111/crj.70132
摘要

ABSTRACT Background Lung cancer is one of the common cancers globally. One of the adverse symptoms of lung cancer and its treatment is fatigue. Pharmacological interventions have not shown efficacy on cancer‐related fatigue, and investigations on nonpharmacological interventions may be useful. This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy of nonpharmacological interventions on managing fatigue and quality of life outcomes among people undergoing treatment for lung cancer and evaluate if treatment efficacy differed between single and multimodal interventions. Methods Relevant literature published in MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and ProQuest from January 2003 to January 2023 was included. Included studies must have: participants over 16 years of age receiving treatment such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and/or surgery, cancer‐related fatigue (CRF) as an outcome, and must be randomized controlled trials. Two reviewers independently extracted data from eligible articles, and data analysis was performed using R 4.1.0 software. Results Total of 14 randomized controlled trials were included and categorized into four groups: physical activities, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), education, and dietary counselling. Our extensive search did not find any multimodal studies related to CRF in patients with lung cancer. Pooled results of this systematic review found that TCM and education interventions have a significant positive impact on fatigue in patients with lung cancer. Physical activity and dietary counselling were not effective in managing fatigue. None of the reported nonpharmacological interventions in this review significantly impact QoL. Conclusions This review identified that TCM and educational programs improved CRF in patients with lung cancer. However, physical activities and dietary counselling did not show any improvements in fatigue for patients undergoing lung cancer treatment. Registration PROSPERO registration ID: CRD42023407326.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
林霄完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
雪白怜阳发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
青墨发布了新的文献求助30
1秒前
1秒前
JRoon发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
1234完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
在路上发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
5秒前
哈哈哈完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
淼鑫完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
天天快乐应助涵霸天采纳,获得10
5秒前
吴家豪完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
Xinyuanpeng关注了科研通微信公众号
5秒前
多多完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
33完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
lc339发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
chy完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
8秒前
Miraitowa发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
大意的姿发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
霹雳枕头完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
勤奋幻露应助喵霸天下采纳,获得20
9秒前
yyyyyyyyy完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
彭于晏应助然后采纳,获得10
10秒前
0318完成签到,获得积分20
10秒前
狂野紫丝发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
聪聪发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
11秒前
健忘的醉蝶完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
姜饼哈哈完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
HYDROLYSE ACIDE DE QUELQUES DIOXASPIROCYCLANES 1314
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
1 Peter and Christ's Descent to the Dead in Its Early Christian Reception 700
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7746918
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9294942
关于积分的说明 20227010
捐赠科研通 7327264
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3308238
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2460152
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2320074