医学
同位
植入
髋臼
核医学
外科
放射科
解剖
作者
Stuart A. Callary,Demiën Broekhuis,Jessica Barends,Boopalan Ramasamy,Rob G. H. H. Nelissen,Lucian B. Solomon,Bart L. Kaptein
出处
期刊:The bone & joint journal
[British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery]
日期:2024-05-01
卷期号:106-B (5 Supple B): 74-81
被引量:5
标识
DOI:10.1302/0301-620x.106b5.bjj-2023-0852.r1
摘要
In using TMARS, more bone is removed, thus achieving more implant-bone apposition within the residual acetabular bone. In CTAC implants, the amount of bone removed is minimal, while the implant-bone apposition is more evenly distributed between the residual acetabulum and the outer cortex of the pelvis. The differences suggest that these implants used to treat pelvic discontinuity might achieve short- and long-term stability through different biomechanical mechanisms.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI