Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration.

加强流行病学观察研究报告 观察研究 检查表 批判性评价 报告审判综合标准 质量(理念) 心理学 语句(逻辑) 梅德林 医学 医学教育 替代医学 病理 政治学 认知心理学 语言学 认识论 哲学 法学
作者
Jan P. Vandenbroucke,Erik von Elm,Douglas G. Altman,Peter C Gøtzsche,Cynthia D. Mulrow,Stuart J. Pocock,Charles Poole,James J. Schlesselman,Matthias Egger
出处
期刊:International Journal of Surgery [Wolters Kluwer]
卷期号:12 (12): 1500-24 被引量:4525
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.014
摘要

Much medical research is observational. The reporting of observational studies is often of insufficient quality. Poor reporting hampers the assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of a study and the generalisability of its results. Taking into account empirical evidence and theoretical considerations, a group of methodologists, researchers, and editors developed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) recommendations to improve the quality of reporting of observational studies. The STROBE Statement consists of a checklist of 22 items, which relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results and discussion sections of articles. Eighteen items are common to cohort studies, case-control studies and cross-sectional studies and four are specific to each of the three study designs. The STROBE Statement provides guidance to authors about how to improve the reporting of observational studies and facilitates critical appraisal and interpretation of studies by reviewers, journal editors and readers. This explanatory and elaboration document is intended to enhance the use, understanding, and dissemination of the STROBE Statement. The meaning and rationale for each checklist item are presented. For each item, one or several published examples and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies and methodological literature are provided. Examples of useful flow diagrams are also included. The STROBE Statement, this document, and the associated Web site (http://www.strobe-statement.org/) should be helpful resources to improve reporting of observational research.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
shan发布了新的文献求助30
刚刚
2秒前
2秒前
huagelihai发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
6秒前
SYLH应助幽灵采纳,获得10
6秒前
LL发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
狄孱完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
HJJ发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
今后应助多元醇采纳,获得10
10秒前
11秒前
Jasper应助gaogao采纳,获得20
11秒前
整齐的访梦完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
大春发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
Lijia_YAO完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
陈川杰应助Yi1采纳,获得100
13秒前
lllyf发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
冬雪发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
14秒前
14秒前
白白发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
二浪完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
Rhapsody发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
18秒前
19秒前
ding应助123采纳,获得10
19秒前
顾矜应助二浪采纳,获得10
19秒前
温柔的柠檬完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
ai化学发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
Liolsy完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
John完成签到 ,获得积分20
21秒前
糖不甜完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
刘畅发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
SYLH应助nicolaslcq采纳,获得10
25秒前
萧一完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
自信无颜发布了新的文献求助30
25秒前
John关注了科研通微信公众号
25秒前
25秒前
高分求助中
【请各位用户详细阅读此贴后再求助】科研通的精品贴汇总(请勿应助) 10000
The Mother of All Tableaux: Order, Equivalence, and Geometry in the Large-scale Structure of Optimality Theory 3000
Global Eyelash Assessment scale (GEA) 1000
Maritime Applications of Prolonged Casualty Care: Drowning and Hypothermia on an Amphibious Warship 500
Comparison analysis of Apple face ID in iPad Pro 13” with first use of metasurfaces for diffraction vs. iPhone 16 Pro 500
Towards a $2B optical metasurfaces opportunity by 2029: a cornerstone for augmented reality, an incremental innovation for imaging (YINTR24441) 500
Materials for Green Hydrogen Production 2026-2036: Technologies, Players, Forecasts 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4052261
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3590379
关于积分的说明 11410445
捐赠科研通 3316928
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1824427
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 896126
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 817210