Distribution of coronal plane alignment of the knee classification does not change as knee osteoarthritis progresses: a longitudinal study from the Toei study

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) phenotypes of individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA) progression. We hypothesized that distributions of CPAK phenotypes would be similar throughout OA progression, despite arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA) and joint line obliquity (JLO) changing. METHODS: A total of 248 patients (79 men and 169 women) participated in the first study in 2012 and the fifth study in 2020. Patients with progression of knee OA for eight years were included. Knee OA progression was defined as advancement from KL grade 0-2 to KL grade 3 or 4. Alignment parameters, including the aHKA, JLO, hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), lateral distal femur angle (LDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), and joint line convergence angle (JLCA), were measured. Changes in distribution of CPAK classifications and alignment parameters were investigated. Alignment parameters were compared using a paired t-test. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. RESULTS: The study included 48 patients (60 knees). The distributions of all CPAK phenotypes were similar between 2012 and 2020. MPTA (83.7° ± 2.8° vs. 82.3° ± 4.8°, p < 0.01), aHKA (- 3.6° ± 3.8° vs. - 4.9° ± 6.2°, p = 0.01), and JLO (171.1° ± 4.6° vs. 169.5° ± 5.1°, p < 0.01) decreased significantly, and JLCA (1.17° ± 2.2° vs. 3.1° ± 4.7°, p < 0.01) and HKA (4.8° ± 3.9° vs. 8.0° ± 5.4°, p < 0.01) increased significantly. In contrast, LDFA (87.4° ± 3.2° vs. 87.2° ± 3.1°, p = n.s.) did not change significantly. CONCLUSIONS: The CPAK classification system can predict constitutional alignment, even with knee OA progression, and enables surgeons to perform individualized preoperative alignment planning according to knee phenotypes.