[Effect of pulmonary rehabilitation training in patients with tracheostomy and non-mechanical ventilation: a prospective cohort study].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the clinical application effects of early pulmonary rehabilitation training based on bundle airway management in patients with tracheostomy and non-mechanical ventilation. METHODS: Used convenience sampling, adult patients who underwent tracheostomy and non-mechanical ventilation admitted to Fenyang Hospital of Shanxi Province from January 2022 to May 2023 were enrolled. Patients were divided into control group and observation group based on their admission dates. The control group implemented bundle airway management based on the Airway care for patients with tracheostomy and non-mechanical ventilation. The observation group received additional pulmonary rehabilitation training implemented by a specialized respiratory rehabilitation team. The primary outcomes included hospital stay duration, improvement rate of muscle strength, diaphragmatic mobility, and successful extubation rate. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of pulmonary infection, improvement rate of self-care ability, and the duration of tracheal tube placement in extubated patients. RESULTS: A total of 41 patients were included in the control group and 39 patients in the observation group. There were no significantly differences in gender, age, first diagnosis of disease, and activities of daily living (ADL) score at admission between the two groups, indicating balanced baseline data and comparability. Compared with the control group, the observation group had a significantly shorter hospital stay (days: 38.33±17.58 vs. 51.34±27.06), a higher improvement rate of muscle strength (76.92% vs. 39.02%), greater diaphragmatic mobility (cm: 1.86±0.64 vs. 1.44±0.57), and a higher success rate of tracheostomy tube extubation (38.46% vs. 17.07%), the duration of tracheal tube placement in successfully extubated patients was significantly reduced (days: 33.26±17.87 vs. 50.60±21.98), with all differences being statistically significant (all P < 0.05). Although the improvement rate of ADL score (56.41% vs. 36.59%) and the incidence of pulmonary infection (5.13% vs. 7.32%) in the observation group were better than those in the control group, but there were no differences (both P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of pulmonary rehabilitation training in bundle airway management can enhance exercise tolerance, improve respiratory function, promote sputum clearance, increase successful extubation rates, shorten hospital stays, and facilitate early recovery in patients with tracheostomy and non-mechanical ventilation.