Methodological quality in randomised controlled trials of transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation for pain: Low fidelity may explain negative findings

经皮神经电刺激 忠诚 医学 心理干预 系统回顾 慢性疼痛 物理医学与康复 梅德林 物理疗法 计算机科学 替代医学 精神科 病理 电信 政治学 法学
作者
Michael J. Bennett,Nicola Hughes,Mark H. Johnson
出处
期刊:Pain [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:152 (6): 1226-1232 被引量:88
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.pain.2010.12.009
摘要

The benefits of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for pain relief have not been reliably established, as most systematic reviews find poor methodological quality in many studies. The paradox within the evidence base for TENS is that despite identified sources of bias that may lead to an overestimation of treatment effects, no benefits for TENS can be clearly demonstrated. Conventional assessments of quality assume a single direction of bias, and little work has been undertaken examining other directions of bias. Our hypothesis was that low fidelity in studies (bias leading to an underestimation of treatment effects) may account for inconclusive findings. We included 38 studies from 3 recently published Cochrane systematic reviews that examined TENS for acute, chronic, and cancer pain. We extracted data relating to treatment allocation, application of TENS and to the assessment of outcomes. We quantified these data and judged this against standardised assessment criteria using a “traffic light” approach based on the number of studies reaching the standard. We identified significant sources of potential bias in both directions in relation to study design and implementation fidelity that have not been quantified previously. Suboptimal dosing of TENS and inappropriate outcome assessment were particularly prevalent weaknesses indicating low fidelity. We propose criteria for judging directions of bias in future studies of TENS that may be adapted to assess other trials in which implementation fidelity is important, such as other nonpharmacological interventions for pain. Poor implementation fidelity was identified as a significant source of bias in systematic reviews of TENS studies and might explain lack of consistent treatment effects of TENS in pain. Here, criteria for assessing methodology are proposed for use in designing future clinical trials of TENS.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
wang完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
阿不卡巴发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
缥缈的初阳完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
勤奋伟泽完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
英俊的铭应助yuanjie采纳,获得10
2秒前
调皮嫣娆完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
炙热的忆雪完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
思源应助科演小能手采纳,获得10
4秒前
hai发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
极乐鸟完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
大大大漂亮完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
诗篇发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
你快睡吧发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
传奇3应助橘子29采纳,获得10
6秒前
7秒前
影子子子完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
科研通AI6.2应助拼搏晓啸采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
茉莉是个饱饱完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
震动的沁发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
hm完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
高高悒完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
NexusExplorer应助大力翠丝采纳,获得10
9秒前
小怡子发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
飘逸太英完成签到,获得积分20
10秒前
昏睡的帆布鞋完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
11秒前
活力孤菱完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
科目三应助Xp0836采纳,获得10
11秒前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition 510
Social Skills Improvement System-Rating Scales--Chinese Version 500
Dynamische Polarisation von H-1 und B-11 in (CH-3)-3NBH-3 500
CLSI M07 2024 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7248316
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8871265
关于积分的说明 18716836
捐赠科研通 6927408
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3198303
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2373907
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2173076