清晨好,您是今天最早来到科研通的研友!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整的填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您科研之路漫漫前行!

Methodological quality in randomised controlled trials of transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation for pain: Low fidelity may explain negative findings

经皮神经电刺激 忠诚 医学 心理干预 系统回顾 慢性疼痛 物理医学与康复 梅德林 物理疗法 计算机科学 替代医学 精神科 病理 电信 政治学 法学
作者
Michael J. Bennett,Nicola Hughes,Mark H. Johnson
出处
期刊:Pain [Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
卷期号:152 (6): 1226-1232 被引量:88
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.pain.2010.12.009
摘要

The benefits of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for pain relief have not been reliably established, as most systematic reviews find poor methodological quality in many studies. The paradox within the evidence base for TENS is that despite identified sources of bias that may lead to an overestimation of treatment effects, no benefits for TENS can be clearly demonstrated. Conventional assessments of quality assume a single direction of bias, and little work has been undertaken examining other directions of bias. Our hypothesis was that low fidelity in studies (bias leading to an underestimation of treatment effects) may account for inconclusive findings. We included 38 studies from 3 recently published Cochrane systematic reviews that examined TENS for acute, chronic, and cancer pain. We extracted data relating to treatment allocation, application of TENS and to the assessment of outcomes. We quantified these data and judged this against standardised assessment criteria using a “traffic light” approach based on the number of studies reaching the standard. We identified significant sources of potential bias in both directions in relation to study design and implementation fidelity that have not been quantified previously. Suboptimal dosing of TENS and inappropriate outcome assessment were particularly prevalent weaknesses indicating low fidelity. We propose criteria for judging directions of bias in future studies of TENS that may be adapted to assess other trials in which implementation fidelity is important, such as other nonpharmacological interventions for pain. Poor implementation fidelity was identified as a significant source of bias in systematic reviews of TENS studies and might explain lack of consistent treatment effects of TENS in pain. Here, criteria for assessing methodology are proposed for use in designing future clinical trials of TENS.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
林夏果完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
哈哈完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
xixi很困完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
hm发布了新的文献求助10
34秒前
薄荷味完成签到 ,获得积分10
35秒前
xaopng完成签到,获得积分10
38秒前
李健应助hm采纳,获得10
42秒前
自由飞翔完成签到 ,获得积分10
46秒前
脑洞疼应助骄傲yy采纳,获得10
48秒前
拓跋雨梅完成签到 ,获得积分0
50秒前
hm完成签到,获得积分10
52秒前
人类繁殖学完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
刘天虎研通完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
cgl155410完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
弧光完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
枫林摇曳完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
KSung完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
聪慧语山完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
戚雅柔完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
2分钟前
骄傲yy发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
骄傲yy完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
baike687发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
hfzmscs完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
jlwang完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
研友_X84KrZ完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
008完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
螃螃完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
CC完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
沧海一粟米完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
zhdjj完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
若眠完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
4分钟前
天宇发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
lyj完成签到 ,获得积分10
5分钟前
5分钟前
amar完成签到 ,获得积分10
5分钟前
夏侯卿完成签到,获得积分10
5分钟前
研友_Fan发布了新的文献求助10
6分钟前
大水完成签到 ,获得积分10
6分钟前
高分求助中
Teaching Social and Emotional Learning in Physical Education 900
Plesiosaur extinction cycles; events that mark the beginning, middle and end of the Cretaceous 800
Recherches Ethnographiques sue les Yao dans la Chine du Sud 500
Two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis reveals causal relationships between blood lipids and venous thromboembolism 500
Chinese-English Translation Lexicon Version 3.0 500
Wisdom, Gods and Literature Studies in Assyriology in Honour of W. G. Lambert 400
薩提亞模式團體方案對青年情侶輔導效果之研究 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 有机化学 工程类 生物化学 纳米技术 物理 内科学 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 电极 光电子学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2391043
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2096424
关于积分的说明 5281295
捐赠科研通 1823815
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 909596
版权声明 559736
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 486056