Analgesic Effectiveness of Liposomal Bupivacaine versus Plain Local Anesthetics for Abdominal Fascial Plane Blocks: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials

医学 止痛药 布比卡因 随机对照试验 麻醉 局部麻醉剂 外科
作者
Nasir Hussain,Jarod Speer,Faraj W. Abdallah
出处
期刊:Anesthesiology [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:140 (5): 906-919 被引量:31
标识
DOI:10.1097/aln.0000000000004932
摘要

Background Liposomal bupivacaine is reported to prolong the duration of analgesia when used for abdominal fascial plane blocks compared to plain local anesthetics; however, evidence from randomized trials is mixed. This meta-analysis aims to compare the analgesic effectiveness of liposomal bupivacaine to plain local anesthetics in adults receiving abdominal fascial plane blocks. Methods Randomized trials comparing liposomal bupivacaine and plain (nonliposomal) local anesthetics in abdominal fascial plane blocks were sought. The primary outcome was area under the curve rest pain between 24 to 72 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included rest pain at individual timepoints (1, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h); analgesic consumption at 0 to 24, 25 to 48, and 49 to 72 h; time to analgesic request; hospital stay duration; and opioid-related side effects. Data were pooled using the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman random effects method. Results Sixteen trials encompassing 1,287 patients (liposomal bupivacaine, 667; plain local anesthetics, 620) were included. The liposomal bupivacaine group received liposomal bupivacaine mixed with plain bupivacaine in 10 studies, liposomal bupivacaine alone in 5 studies, and both preparations in 1 three-armed study. No difference was observed between the two groups for area under the curve pain scores, with a standardized mean difference (95% CI) of –0.21 cm.h (–0.43 to 0.01; P = 0.058; I 2 = 48%). Results were robust to subgroup analysis based on (1) potential conflict of interest and (2) mixing of plain local anesthetics with liposomal bupivacaine. The two groups were not different for any of the day 2 or day 3 secondary outcomes. Conclusions This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests similar analgesic effectiveness between liposomal bupivacaine and plain local anesthetics when used for fascial plane block of the abdominal wall. The authors’ analysis does not support an evidence-based preference for liposomal bupivacaine compared to plain local anesthetics for abdominal fascial plane blocks. Editor’s Perspective What We Already Know about This Topic What This Article Tells Us That Is New
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
April完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
可爱的梦菲完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
肉包子发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
火画完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
89哥完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
镇痛蚊子发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
文静的天蓝完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
柏_完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
otto12306完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
雷梦芝完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
谨慎时光完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
活力成败完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
james完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
HC发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
8秒前
邢仟仟发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
windli发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
大个应助余华采纳,获得10
8秒前
减脂五花肉完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
丁丁当当完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
11秒前
稀饭红红儿完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
ningwu完成签到,获得积分0
11秒前
糖堆儿爱吃糖完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
cyyao002完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
12秒前
jstagey完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
Copyright应助小郭同学采纳,获得10
12秒前
BBBBBONES完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
兔纸完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
余杭村王小虎完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
壮观复天发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis, 4th Edition 1000
Organic Reactions, Volume 116 1000
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition 510
Social Skills Improvement System-Rating Scales--Chinese Version 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7253170
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8875348
关于积分的说明 18736290
捐赠科研通 6933751
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3199896
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2374618
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2174539