医学
肾细胞癌
酪氨酸激酶抑制剂
危险系数
肿瘤科
内科学
实体瘤疗效评价标准
队列
肾透明细胞癌
癌症
临床试验
置信区间
临床研究阶段
作者
Kosuke Takemura,Vishal Navani,Matthew Scott Ernst,J. Connor Wells,Luís Meza,Sumanta K. Pal,Jae‐Lyun Lee,Haoran Li,Neeraj Agarwal,Ajjai Alva,Aaron R. Hansen,Naveen S. Basappa,Bernadett Szabados,Thomas Powles,Ben Tran,Christopher Hocking,Benoit Beuselinck,Takeshi Yuasa,Toni K. Choueiri,Daniel Y.C. Heng
标识
DOI:10.1097/ju.0000000000003132
摘要
PURPOSE: Clinical trials have demonstrated higher complete response rates in the immuno-oncology-based combination arms than in the tyrosine kinase inhibitor arms in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. We aimed to characterize real-world patients who experienced complete response to the contemporary first-line therapies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium, response-evaluable patients who received frontline immuno-oncology-based combination therapy or tyrosine kinase inhibitor monotherapy were analyzed. Baseline characteristics of patients and post-landmark overall survival were compared based on best overall response, as per RECIST 1.1. RESULTS: 001). CONCLUSIONS: The complete response rate was not as high in the real-world population as in the clinical trial population. Among those who experienced complete response, several adverse clinicopathological features were more frequently observed in the immuno-oncology-based cohort than in the tyrosine kinase inhibitor cohort. Complete response was an indicator of favorable overall survival.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI