Defining high bleeding risk in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a consensus document from the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk

医学 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 大出血 梅德林 严重出血 外科 内科学 心肌梗塞 法学 政治学
作者
Philip Urban,Roxana Mehran,Róisín Colleran,Dominick J. Angiolillo,Robert A. Byrne,Davide Capodanno,Thomas Cuisset,Donald E. Cutlip,Pedro Eerdmans,John W. Eikelboom,Andrew Farb,C. Michael Gibson,John Gregson,Michael Haude,Stefan James,Hyo‐Soo Kim,Takeshi Kimura,Akihide Konishi,John C. Laschinger,Martin B. Leon
出处
期刊:European Heart Journal [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:40 (31): 2632-2653 被引量:535
标识
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz372
摘要

Abstract Identification and management of patients at high bleeding risk undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention are of major importance, but a lack of standardization in defining this population limits trial design, data interpretation, and clinical decision-making. The Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) is a collaboration among leading research organizations, regulatory authorities, and physician-scientists from the United States, Asia, and Europe focusing on percutaneous coronary intervention–related bleeding. Two meetings of the 31-member consortium were held in Washington, DC, in April 2018 and in Paris, France, in October 2018. These meetings were organized by the Cardiovascular European Research Center on behalf of the ARC-HBR group and included representatives of the US Food and Drug Administration and the Japanese Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, as well as observers from the pharmaceutical and medical device industries. A consensus definition of patients at high bleeding risk was developed that was based on review of the available evidence. The definition is intended to provide consistency in defining this population for clinical trials and to complement clinical decision-making and regulatory review. The proposed ARC-HBR consensus document represents the first pragmatic approach to a consistent definition of high bleeding risk in clinical trials evaluating the safety and effectiveness of devices and drug regimens for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
简单秋烟发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
大橘完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
左惋庭发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
不散的和弦完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
喜悦的秋柔完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
6秒前
知性的幼晴应助wwlllzzttt采纳,获得10
6秒前
留下就好完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
爱吃饼干的土拨鼠完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
TAT完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
CipherSage应助studying采纳,获得10
7秒前
syp发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
9秒前
FashionBoy应助北蓝采纳,获得10
11秒前
聪明书蝶完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
上官若男应助忐忑的上下采纳,获得20
12秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
小天尼完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
HITFEI完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
yuziiii发布了新的文献求助100
14秒前
充电宝应助迅速平灵采纳,获得10
15秒前
Platinum完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
李晓诗完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
16秒前
123完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
sui完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
真不懂了嗷完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
牛的兄弟发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
21秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
小橙完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
23秒前
orixero应助活泼苑博采纳,获得10
24秒前
科研通AI6.1应助逐梦采纳,获得10
25秒前
25秒前
佳jia发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
科研通AI6.1应助高天雨采纳,获得10
28秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Encyclopedia of Forensic and Legal Medicine Third Edition 5000
Introduction to strong mixing conditions volume 1-3 5000
Agyptische Geschichte der 21.30. Dynastie 3000
Aerospace Engineering Education During the First Century of Flight 2000
„Semitische Wissenschaften“? 1510
从k到英国情人 1500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5770023
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 5582550
关于积分的说明 15423156
捐赠科研通 4903584
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2638255
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1586124
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1541285