Effectiveness of laser-engineered copper-nickel titanium versus superelastic nickel-titanium aligning archwires: A randomized clinical trial

Effectiveness of laser-engineered copper-nickel titanium versus superelastic nickel-titanium aligning archwires: A randomized clinical trial Objective: To compare the effectiveness of laser-engineered copper-nickel titanium (SmartArch) and superelastic nickel-titanium (SENT) archwires in aligning teeth and inducing root resorption and pain experienced by patients.Methods: Two-arm parallel groups with a 1:1 allocation ratio were used.The participants were patients aged 11.5 years and older with 5-9 mm of mandibular anterior crowding who were indicated for non-extraction treatment.The primary outcome was alignment effectiveness, assessed using Little's irregularity index (LII) over 16 weeks with a single wire (0.016-inch) in the SmartArch group and 2 wires (0.014-and 0.018-inch) in the SENT group (8 weeks each).Secondary outcomes included root resorption evaluated by pre-and post-intervention periapical radiographs and pain levels recorded by the participants during the first week.Results: A total of 40 participants were randomly allocated into 2 groups; 33 completed the study and were analyzed (16 in the SmartArch group and 17 in the SENT group, aged 16.97 ± 4.05 years).The total LII decrease for the SmartArch and SENT groups was 5.63 mm and 5.29 mm, respectively, which was neither statistically nor clinically significant.Root resorption was not significantly different between the groups.The difference in pain levels was not statistically significant for the first 5 days following wire placement; however, there was a significant difference favoring the SENT group in the final 2 days.Conclusions: SmartArch and SENT archwires were similarly effective during the alignment phase of orthodontic treatment.Root resorption should be observed throughout the treatment with either wire.SmartArch wires demonstrated higher pain perception than SENT wires.