Comparison of Bedside and Video-Based Capillary Refill Time Assessment in Children

Objectives Capillary refill time (CRT) to assess peripheral perfusion in children with suspected shock may be subject to poor reproducibility. Our objectives were to compare video-based and bedside CRT assessment using a standardized protocol and evaluate interrater and intrarater consistency of video-based CRT (VB-CRT) assessment. We hypothesized that measurement errors associated with raters would be low for both standardized bedside CRT and VB-CRT as well as VB-CRT across raters. Methods Ninety-nine children (aged 1–12 y) had 5 consecutive bedside CRT assessments by an experienced critical care clinician following a standardized protocol. Each CRT assessment was video recorded on a black background. Thirty video clips (10 with bedside CRT < 1 s, 10 with CRT 1–2 s, and 10 with CRT > 2 s) were randomly selected and presented to 10 clinicians twice in randomized order. They were instructed to push a button when they visualized release of compression and completion of a capillary refill. The correlation and absolute difference between bedside and VB-CRT were assessed. Consistency across raters and within each rater was analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). A Generalizability study was performed to evaluate sources of variation. Results We found moderate agreement between bedside and VB-CRT observations (r = 0.65; P < 0.001). The VB-CRT values were shorter by 0.17 s (95% confidence interval, 0.09–0.25; P < 0.001) on average compared with bedside CRT. There was moderate agreement in VB-CRT across raters (ICC = 0.61). Consistency of repeated VB-CRT within each rater was moderate (ICC = 0.71). Generalizability study revealed the source of largest variance was from individual patient video clips (57%), followed by interaction of the VB-CRT reviewer and patient video clip (10.7%). Conclusions Bedside and VB-CRT observations showed moderate consistency. Using video-based assessment, moderate consistency was also observed across raters and within each rater. Further investigation to standardize and automate CRT measurement is warranted.