Antimicrobial efficacy of two irrigation techniques in tapered and non-tapered canal preparations. A randomized controlled clinical trial.

抗菌剂 随机对照试验 医学 牙科 口腔正畸科 外科 生物 微生物学
作者
Nestor Cohenca,Avina Paranjpe,Carlos Heilborn,James D. Johnson
标识
DOI:10.3290/j.qi.a29055
摘要

The aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to investigate the antimicrobial efficacy of traditional positive pressure (PP) irrigation compared with apical negative pressure (ANP) in tapered as well as non-tapered root canal preparation techniques.Patients referred for treatment of mandibular permanent molars with necrotic pulps and apical periodontitis were considered for this study. A total of 32 eligible teeth were evaluated based on strict inclusion and exclusion criteria and randomly assigned as follows: Group 1: LightSpeed LSX 0.02 preparation and A NP irrigation (n = 8). Group 2: LightSpeed LSX 0.02 preparation and PP irrigation (n = 8). Group 3: ProTaper preparation and A NP irrigation (n = 8). Group 4: ProTaper preparation and PP irrigation (n = 8). A ll teeth were sampled immediately upon access (S1), after completion of the chemo- mechanical preparation (S2), and one week later after intracanal medication (S3). All samples were microbiologically processed immediately and plated in duplicates on aerobic plates, anaerobic plates, and chocolate plates and colonies statistically analyzed.No statistically significant differences were found between groups at S1. When comparing colony-forming unit (CFU) levels at S1 and S2 within groups, the reduction was statistically significant in all groups. While no significant difference was found in the proportion of teeth that culture positive at either S2 or S3 by shaping groups, a significant difference was noted when comparing PP irrigation and A NP groups. The percentage of samples in the PP irrigation group with a negative culture at both time points was 67%, compared to 100% among the A NP group.Within the limitations of the present study, taper and apical size failed to demonstrate a difference in microbiological reduction of cultivable bacteria. On the other hand, A NP revealed a significant difference when compared to PP irrigation.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
kento应助化龙采纳,获得150
1秒前
孤独手机完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
星辰大海应助liangmh采纳,获得10
5秒前
JamesPei应助王某采纳,获得10
5秒前
zhaoxiaonuan完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
天真的人英完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
daliu完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
bias完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
子车茗应助快乐小子采纳,获得30
7秒前
搜集达人应助Rachel采纳,获得10
9秒前
10秒前
这小猪真帅完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
12秒前
12秒前
牛雨桐完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
终醒发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
PetrichorF完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
16秒前
liangmh发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
轩辕寄风完成签到,获得积分0
23秒前
luxiuzhen发布了新的文献求助40
25秒前
小孙完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
隐形曼青应助终醒采纳,获得10
28秒前
英姑应助JIANYOUFU采纳,获得10
31秒前
34秒前
碗碗完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
NexusExplorer应助iron采纳,获得10
35秒前
36秒前
daqing完成签到,获得积分20
36秒前
36秒前
Ava应助安谢采纳,获得10
38秒前
38秒前
达瓦里希完成签到 ,获得积分10
39秒前
馨橣发布了新的文献求助10
40秒前
田様应助ZQH采纳,获得10
41秒前
spiritpope发布了新的文献求助10
41秒前
酷波er应助无辜的鼠标采纳,获得10
43秒前
45秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各位详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Voyage au bout de la révolution: de Pékin à Sochaux 700
First Farmers: The Origins of Agricultural Societies, 2nd Edition 500
Simulation of High-NA EUV Lithography 400
Assessment of adverse effects of Alzheimer's disease medications: Analysis of notifications to Regional Pharmacovigilance Centers in Northwest France 400
The Rise & Fall of Classical Legal Thought 260
Vortices in nonlinear Fields: From Liquid Crystals to Superfluids From Non-Equilibrium Patterns to Cosmic Strings 200
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4334494
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3845702
关于积分的说明 12012097
捐赠科研通 3486267
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1913615
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 956737
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 857430