奥美拉唑
医学
阿莫西林
内科学
克拉霉素
质子抑制剂泵
胃肠病学
幽门螺杆菌
药物治疗
抗生素
微生物学
生物
作者
Ali Tüzün İnce,Mukaddes Tozlu,Birol Baysal,Hakan Şentürk,Sema Arıcı,Ali Özden
出处
期刊:PubMed
日期:2014-12-02
卷期号:61 (133): 1454-8
被引量:8
摘要
BACKGROUND/AIMs: H. pylori eradication has been recommended for dyspeptic patients in high prevalance regions. Triple therapies are still prescribed mostly because culture and antibiotic susceptibility tests aren’t widely available in the world. Dual therapy with high-dose proton pump inhibitors reported to have higher eradication rates. Our objective was to determine eradication success and cost-effectivity of dual therapy in dyspeptic patients.Patients were treated orally with either dual (n:74,omeprazole 20mg q.i.d and amoxicillin 1g b.i.d) or triple therapy (n:116,omeprazole 20mg b.i.d and amoxicillin 1g b.i.d and clarithromycin 500mg b.i.d) for 14 days. HpSA was requested 3 months later. The results were evaluated statistically, p values ˂0,05 were considered significant.Patients (n:190) were included the study((80 female,110 male, mean age: 35.6±11year(p<0.001)). Alcohol/smoking, endoscopic findings and H. pylori rates with pathological examinations were not significantly different between groups whereas there was a significant difference in HpFast tests(p<0.01). When examined with HpSA tests 3 months after the treatment, eradication rate was 81.1% in the dual therapy group versus 63.8% in the triple therapy group (p:0.011). Dual therapy was economic than triple therapy (144USDvs.107USD,p<0.001).Dual therapy seems more successful, cost-effective and is less risky in terms of side effects compared to standard triple therapy in patients with dyspepsia.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI