课程
医学教育
医学
医学院
心理学
数学教育
教育学
作者
Amy Sullivan,Edward Krupat,Jules L. Dienstag,Jakob I. McSparron,Stephen R. Pelletier,Sara B. Fazio,Thomas J. Fleenor,John L. Dalrymple,Edward M. Hundert,Richard M. Schwartzstein
出处
期刊:Medical Teacher
[Taylor & Francis]
日期:2022-06-28
卷期号:44 (11): 1268-1276
被引量:22
标识
DOI:10.1080/0142159x.2022.2081142
摘要
Purpose The Harvard Medical School Pathways curriculum represents a major reform effort. Our goals were to enhance reasoning and clinical skills and improve the learning environment and students’ approach to learning via use of collaborative, case-based pedagogy; early clinical exposure; and enhanced approaches to teaching and evaluating clinical skills. We evaluated the impact of Pathways on key outcomes related to these goals.Materials and methods In this prospective, mixed-methods study, we compared the last prior-curriculum cohort (2014 matriculation, n = 135) and first new-curriculum cohort (2015 matriculation, n = 135). Measures included Likert-type surveys, focus groups, and test scores to assess outcomes.Results Compared with prior-curriculum students, new-curriculum students reported higher mean preclerkship learning environment ratings (Educational Climate Inventory, 62.4 versus 51.9, p < 0.0001) and greater satisfaction with the quality of their preclerkship education (88% versus 73%, p = 0.0007). Mean USMLE Step-1 and Step-2 scores did not differ between groups. At graduation, new-curriculum students rated their medical school experience higher in 6 of 7 domains, including ‘fostering a culture of curiosity and inquiry’ (4.3 versus 3.9, p = 0.006) and focus on ‘student-centered learning’ (3.9 versus 3.4, p = 0.002).Conclusions The new curriculum outperformed or was equal to the prior one on most measures of learning environment and perceived quality of education, without a decline in medical knowledge or clinical skills. Robust longitudinal evaluation provided important feedback for ongoing curriculum improvement.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI