入学
课程
医学教育
刻度(仪器)
医学
队列
医学院
心理学
教育学
内科学
几何学
数学
作者
Amy Sullivan,Edward Krupat,Jules L. Dienstag,Jakob I. McSparron,Stephen R. Pelletier,Sara B. Fazio,Thomas J. Fleenor,John L. Dalrymple,Edward M. Hundert,Richard M. Schwartzstein
标识
DOI:10.1080/0142159x.2022.2081142
摘要
Purpose The Harvard Medical School Pathways curriculum represents a major reform effort. Our goals were to enhance reasoning and clinical skills and improve the learning environment and students’ approach to learning via use of collaborative, case-based pedagogy; early clinical exposure; and enhanced approaches to teaching and evaluating clinical skills. We evaluated the impact of Pathways on key outcomes related to these goals.Materials and methods In this prospective, mixed-methods study, we compared the last prior-curriculum cohort (2014 matriculation, n = 135) and first new-curriculum cohort (2015 matriculation, n = 135). Measures included Likert-type surveys, focus groups, and test scores to assess outcomes.Results Compared with prior-curriculum students, new-curriculum students reported higher mean preclerkship learning environment ratings (Educational Climate Inventory, 62.4 versus 51.9, p < 0.0001) and greater satisfaction with the quality of their preclerkship education (88% versus 73%, p = 0.0007). Mean USMLE Step-1 and Step-2 scores did not differ between groups. At graduation, new-curriculum students rated their medical school experience higher in 6 of 7 domains, including ‘fostering a culture of curiosity and inquiry’ (4.3 versus 3.9, p = 0.006) and focus on ‘student-centered learning’ (3.9 versus 3.4, p = 0.002).Conclusions The new curriculum outperformed or was equal to the prior one on most measures of learning environment and perceived quality of education, without a decline in medical knowledge or clinical skills. Robust longitudinal evaluation provided important feedback for ongoing curriculum improvement.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI