Risk Factors of Lymph Node Metastasis and Prognosis in 891 Chinese Patients With Submucosal Early Gastric Carcinoma, Emphasizing Differences Between Gastric Cardiac and Noncardiac Origins

Differences in risk factors (RF) of lymph node metastasis (LNM) and prognosis between submucosal early gastric cardiac (SEGCC) and noncardiac (SEGNCC) carcinomas remain unclear. In this study, we investigated and compared RF of LNM and prognosis in 891 patients with radical gastrectomy for SEGCC (n=217) or SEGNCC (n=674). Compared with SEGNCC, SEGCC displayed significantly higher proportion of elderly patients (70 y or above), the elevated macroscopic type, well/moderately differentiated tubular and low-grade papillary adenocarcinomas, as well as low-grade tumor budding, but lower prevalence of the depressed macroscopic type, poorly differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma, mixed adenocarcinoma, poorly cohesive carcinoma, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), perineural invasion, and high-grade tumor budding. By univariate analysis, significant RF for LNM of the cohort included female sex, poor differentiation, SM2 invasion, LVI, intermediate-grade and high-grade tumor budding, whereas tumor size, histology type, and perineural invasion were the significant RF for LNM in SEGNCC. By multivariate analysis, significant independent RF for LNM included female sex and LVI in SEGCC but were female sex, mixed adenocarcinoma, LVI, and high-grade tumor budding in SEGNCC. The 5-year overall survival was significantly worse in SEGCC than in SEGNCC for patients with LNM, but not for those without. For overall survival, LNM was the only significant independent RF in SEGCC, whereas age 70 years or above and LNM were independent RF in SEGNCC. The results of our study provided the clinicopathologic evidence for individualized clinical management strategies for these 2 groups of patients and suggested different pathogenesis mechanisms between SEGCC and SEGNCC.