过度消费
环境卫生
公共卫生
利益相关者
业务
范围(计算机科学)
消费(社会学)
食品安全
风险评估
营销
医学
政治学
经济
公共关系
计算机科学
程序设计语言
生产(经济)
管理
护理部
社会学
病理
宏观经济学
社会科学
作者
Cherie Russell,Phillip Baker,Carley Grimes,Mark Lawrence
标识
DOI:10.1093/heapro/daac101
摘要
Summary We aimed to understand the process of setting or varying food standards related to non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS) in Australia and New Zealand. Overconsumption of added sugars is a risk factor for non-communicable diseases. Limiting added sugar consumption is recommended by the World Health Organization. NNS are sweet substances with little to no energy that can be used to maintain the sweetness of packaged food when added sugar is reduced. The health and dietary pattern impacts of NNS are contested. Understanding how and why applications for NNS are submitted, assessed and approved within food regulatory systems is important to contextualize the increasing availability of NNS in the food supply. We completed an interpretive content analysis of applications to change the Food Standards Australia and New Zealand (FSANZ) Code, risk assessments and stakeholder submissions. Literature used in risk assessments were drawn from a mixture of documents supplied by industry and peer-reviewed studies. Risk assessments were primarily focussed on toxicological outcomes, while broader public health outcomes were not explicitly considered. Consumption data available to FSANZ were collected several years prior to dietary exposure assessments, and thus may not accurately represent current intakes. The study findings raise questions about whether the scope of what constitutes a ‘risk’ to public health in the setting of food standards needs to extend beyond immediate toxicological and food safety concerns, to include longer-term dietary balance considerations.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI