医学
语句(逻辑)
临床试验
扩展(谓词逻辑)
替代医学
随机对照试验
梅德林
联想(心理学)
报告审判综合标准
家庭医学
资源(消歧)
研究设计
结果(博弈论)
重症监护医学
科学证据
疾病
老年学
完备性(序理论)
作者
Mario Gaudino,Sigrid Sandner,Emilia Bagiella,Joshua A. Beckman,E Belley-Cote,Marcus Flather,Alexander C. Gregg,Irbaz Hameed,Stuart Pocock,Björn Redfors,Frank Rockhold
出处
期刊:Circulation
[Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
日期:2026-08-03
标识
DOI:10.1161/cir.0000000000001458
摘要
Extension follow-up trials are essential for understanding the long-term safety and efficacy of cardiovascular interventions. Whereas primary randomized trials primarily capture short-term outcomes, extended observation may reveal delayed benefits or harms that are highly relevant to clinical decision-making. However, methodologic standards for extension trials remain poorly defined, leading to inconsistent design, analysis, and reporting. This scientific statement outlines best practices for cardiovascular trial extensions, addressing outcome selection, duration and completeness of follow-up, and analytic strategies suited to evolving treatment effects. Practical considerations, including strategies for participant retention, reconsent, data continuity, and resource allocation, are also discussed.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI