A New Approach in Management of Orbital Adherence Syndrome

Orbital walls are one of the most common sites of midface fractures and account for ~40% of traumatic injuries in this region. These fractures are often associated with changes in the anatomy of the orbital cavity and frequently affect the orbital inferior wall, infraorbital groove and canal, and medial orbital wall, which leads to changes in its pattern and volume as well. Generally, the forces required for brake superior and lateral walls are greater than those required for thin medial and inferior walls. Disruption of any of these structures leads to the expansion of orbital volume that brings to the appearance of enophthalmos, diplopia, and impaired ocular mobility. The gold standard in the treatment of orbital wall fractures is surgical reconstruction, that includes fracture site exposure, freeing tissue prolapsed into the fracture site, and re-approximating the orbital wall support, usually with an orbital implant. It usually could be achieved by the usage of such as transconjunctival, subciliary, and coronal approaches and implementation of graft and reconstructive materials, including bones, cartilage, titanium, and resorbable mesh. Today, the gold standard in orbital floor reconstruction is the application of titanium mesh orbital plates. However, their implementation could be associated with a number of postoperative complications, such as mispositioning and orbital adherence syndrome. Orbital adherence syndrome is a poorly described and understood phenomenon and appears to occur after the use of large-pored titanium mesh for orbital reconstruction. It usually appears as limited eye movement that appears 1 to 2 weeks after reconstructive procedure. Prevention is possible through careful patient selection and the placement of a smooth interface medium in the initial surgery. The aim of the current study is to present the outcomes of orbital reconstruction done by both orbital mesh and customized ​​smooth-surfaced titanium orbital implants.