文档
标准化
心理学
神经心理学
考试(生物学)
临床试验
可靠性(半导体)
认知测验
认知
医学
计算机科学
精神科
量子力学
生物
操作系统
物理
病理
古生物学
功率(物理)
程序设计语言
作者
Stephen M. Meyer,Kristina Bertzos,Magdalena Perez,Donald J. Connor,Kimberly Schafer,Sarah Walter
标识
DOI:10.2174/1567205014666170417122744
摘要
The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale (ADASCog) remains the most widely used test of longitudinal cognitive functioning in Alzheimer's disease (AD) clinical trials. Unlike most neuropsychological tests, the ADAS-Cog source documentation worksheets are not uniform across clinical trials, and vary by document layout, inclusion of administration and/or scoring instructions, and documentation of subtest scoring (e.g., recording correct versus incorrect scores), among other differences. Many ADAS-Cog test administrators (raters) participate in multiple AD trials and switching between different ADAS-Cog worksheets may increase the likelihood of administration and/or scoring mistakes that lessen the reliability of the instrument. An anonymous online survey sought raters' experiences with ADAS-Cog worksheets and their opinions on the design and content of the worksheets.Results of the survey indicated preference for structure and standardization of the ADASCog worksheets, which has been considered in the development of a standard ADAS-Cog source document by the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study (ADCS) Working Group.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI