Effects of Ropivacaine-Based Thoracic Paravertebral Block versus Erector Spinae Plane Block on Quality of Recovery in Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

作者
Shuaibo Shi,Yuhao Liang,Tao Liu,Junlong Wang,Xuanxuan Xu,Axue Cheng,Hui Wang,Jie Hu
出处
期刊:Drug Design Development and Therapy [Dove Medical Press]
卷期号:Volume 20: 1-15
标识
DOI:10.2147/dddt.s581084
摘要

Background: Colorectal cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Postoperative pain can impair recovery. Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) are regional analgesic techniques that may enhance recovery, but their comparative efficacy in colorectal surgery is not well established. This study aimed to compare the effects of TPVB and ESPB on the quality of recovery in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery. Methods: In this single-center, single-blind, randomized controlled trial, 87 patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery were initially enrolled and randomly assigned. Ultimately, 85 patients were included in the per-protocol analysis, distributed as follows: the bilateral TPVB (n = 29), the bilateral ESPB (n = 28), and the control (n = 28). Both blocks were performed at the T10 level using 20 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine per side. The primary outcome was the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores at 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, overall benefit of analgesia scores (OBAS), area under the curve (AUC) analyses for these scores and opioid consumption. Results: Both TPVB and ESPB groups had higher QoR-15 scores at 24 hours compared to controls (TPVB: 122.03 ± 4.00, ESPB: 119.00 ± 3.09, Control: 109.79 ± 2.89; both P < 0.001). TPVB provided a statistically significant, yet clinically modest, improvement in recovery over ESPB at 24 hours (mean difference [MD] 3.03; 95% CI, 0.09 to 5.98; P = 0.036). However, QoR‑15 AUC over 72 hours did not differ between blocks ( P = 0.12). Both blocks resulted in better OBAS throughout the first 48 hours (all P < 0.05). TPVB also demonstrated better early resting pain control at 6 hours ( P = 0.012) but had a longer performance time than ESPB ( P = 0.003). Both intervention groups reduced opioid consumption. Conclusion: Both TPVB and ESPB improve recovery quality and analgesia after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. Overall, the two block techniques provided comparable benefits for postoperative recovery and analgesia. Trial Registration: ChiCTR2400089500. Keywords: erector spinae plane block, paravertebral block, quality of recovery, enhanced recovery after surgery, colorectal cancer

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
小yang完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
1秒前
曾经的语堂完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
心念发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
在水一方的应助被超帅的薯片采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
yyds的应助被zero采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
英俊的铭的应助被myuniv采纳,获得10
4秒前
李小葵发布了新的文献求助20
4秒前
5秒前
曾经凡之发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
yiii完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
Eric的应助被YoMI采纳,获得10
6秒前
xyy发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
jiu九发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
Cha完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
7秒前
8秒前
111发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
1997发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
点一直端完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
123456lyf发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
thurman发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
杨静怡发布了新的文献求助30
10秒前
科研通AI6.2的应助被大灰灰采纳,获得10
10秒前
11秒前
elephant发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
12秒前
Small_M完成签到,获得积分20
12秒前
KScrazy完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
sunny发布了新的文献求助30
13秒前
orixero的应助被木习习采纳,获得10
13秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Energie-Contracting 1500
Klimaschutzrecht durch den Energiesektor im Mehrebenensystem – Ein Rechtsvergleich 1000
Oncology Clinical Trials: Successful Design, Conduct, and Analysis, Second Edition 800
Stochastic Models in Operations Research,Vol. 2 600
Organizational Behavior 510
桑白皮エキスの実験的, 臨床的育毛効果について 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8044892
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9476411
关于积分的说明 21283878
捐赠科研通 7612429
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3392137
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2523632
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2430005