Verification of automated review, release and reporting of results with assessment of the risk of harm for patients: the procedure algorithm proposal for clinical laboratories

危害 计算机科学 医学物理学 算法 医学 风险分析(工程) 心理学 社会心理学
作者
Marijana Miler,Nora Nikolac,Gordan Šimić,Adriana Unić,Lara Milevoj Kopčinović,M Bozović,Anita Radman,Alen Vrtarić,Mario Štefanović,Ines Vukasović
出处
期刊:Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine [De Gruyter]
卷期号:63 (6): 1109-1117 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1515/cclm-2024-1164
摘要

OBJECTIVES: Autoverification increases the efficiency of laboratories. Laboratories accredited according to ISO 15189:2022 need to validate their processes, including autoverification, and assess the associated risks to patient safety. The aim of this study was to propose a systematic verification algorithm for autoverification and to assess its potential risks. METHODS: The study was conducted using retrospective data from the Laboratory Information System (LIS). Seven laboratory medicine specialists participated. Autoverification rules were defined for analytes in serum, stool, urine and whole blood determined on Alinity ci (Abbott), Atellica 1500 (Siemens) and ABL90 FLEX (Radiometer). Criteria included internal quality control results, instrument flags, hemolysis/icteria/lipemia indices, median patient values, critical values, measurement ranges, delta checks, and reference values. Verification was performed step by step. Risk analysis was performed using Failure Modes and Effects Analysis and the Risk Priority Number (RPN) was calculated. RESULTS: During the study, 23,633 laboratory reports were generated, containing 246,579 test results for 167 biochemical tests. Of these, 198,879 (80.66 %) met the criteria for autoverification. For 2,057 results (0.83 %), the experts disagreed with the autoverification criteria (false negatives). Discrepancies were mainly associated to median and delta check values. Only 45 false positives (0.02 %) were identified, resulting in an RPN of 0 for all cases. CONCLUSIONS: The autoverified and non-autoverified results showed high agreement with the expert opinions, with minimal disagreement (0.02 % and 0.83 %, respectively). The risk analysis showed that autoverification did not pose a significant risk to patient safety. This study, the first of its kind, provides step-by-step recommendations for implementing autoverification in laboratories.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
struggling发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
温暖的鼠标完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
深情安青应助xx采纳,获得10
1秒前
Jervis完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
自信的竹员外完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
FurtherYao完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
羊羊完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
小张在努力完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
undo完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
zzz应助soos采纳,获得30
4秒前
有魅力以珊完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
5秒前
淡淡的问筠完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
FlipFlops完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
轻松凌柏发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
可爱的函函应助liuduo采纳,获得10
6秒前
why完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
okay完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
xxxx完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
Junzhuo Zhou发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
Laila发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
FurtherYao发布了新的文献求助30
8秒前
glow发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
自然的书萱完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
开心书本发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
标致秋尽完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
成就的安阳完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
Jiayou Zhang完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
高分求助中
Clinical Epidemiology: The Essentials, 6e 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Graphene Handbook (2019 Edition) 800
Adhesion Science: Principles & Practice 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Fundamentals of Pharmaceutical and Biologics Regulations: A Global Perspective, Second Edition 600
久松真一著作集〈第5巻〉禅と芸術 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6556643
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8340561
关于积分的说明 17869527
捐赠科研通 5675268
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2940630
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1916539
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1787340