亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

A comparison between hyaluronic acid and other single ingredient eye drops for dry eye, a review

医学 透明质酸 眼药水 梅德林 内科学 眼科 生物 生物化学 解剖
作者
Leif Hynnekleiv,Morten Schjerven Magnø,Emily Moschowits,Kim Alexander Tønseth,Jelle Vehof,Tor Paaske Utheim
出处
期刊:Acta Ophthalmologica [Wiley]
卷期号:102 (1): 25-37 被引量:11
标识
DOI:10.1111/aos.15675
摘要

Abstract Dry eye disease (DED) is a highly prevalent and debilitating condition. Hyaluronic acid (HA) is a naturally occurring glycosaminoglycan that has a long history as a safe and effective DED treatment. HA is frequently used as a comparator when assessing other topical DED treatments. This study aims to summarise and critically evaluate the literature describing all isolated active ingredients that have been directly compared with HA in the treatment of DED. A literature search was conducted in Embase using Ovid on the 24th of August 2021 and in PubMed including MEDLINE on the 20th of September 2021. Twenty‐three studies met the inclusion criteria, 21 of which were randomised controlled trials. Seventeen different ingredients representing six treatment categories were compared with HA treatment. Most measures showed no significant difference between treatments, suggesting either equivalency of treatments or that studies were underpowered. Only two ingredients were represented in more than two studies; carboxymethyl cellulose treatment appears equivalent to HA treatment, while Diquafosol treatment appears superior to HA treatment. Drop‐frequency varied from one to eight drops daily. No single study explained the choice of drop frequency. Nine studies used a HA concentration of 0.1% which may be below therapeutic levels. Nine studies reported using preserved formulations, six of them with differences in preservatives between the compared groups. Thirteen studies were financially linked to industry. No major complications were reported. Studies were not designed to find differences in treatment effects for different types or severities of DED. HA is a good comparator treatment when assessing other DED treatments, although consensus after decades of use is still lacking for best choice of concentration, molecular weight and drop tonicity. Well‐designed studies are needed to determine an evidence‐based standard for HA treatment to be used as comparator.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
maox1aoxin应助Ken采纳,获得30
1秒前
旧残月发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
zky完成签到,获得积分20
6秒前
自信树叶完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
王俊完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
ZXneuro完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
Owen应助醉熏的井采纳,获得10
10秒前
小马甲应助醉熏的井采纳,获得10
10秒前
田様应助醉熏的井采纳,获得10
10秒前
orixero应助醉熏的井采纳,获得10
10秒前
15秒前
麻花阳完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
ly完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
愔愔应助poieu采纳,获得20
23秒前
23秒前
27秒前
成就人杰发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
Alice完成签到 ,获得积分10
31秒前
醉熏的井发布了新的文献求助10
32秒前
小付发布了新的文献求助10
33秒前
小二郎应助Chenyol采纳,获得10
35秒前
wu完成签到,获得积分10
38秒前
40秒前
年轻千愁完成签到 ,获得积分10
40秒前
依桉完成签到 ,获得积分10
42秒前
42秒前
址儿发布了新的文献求助10
43秒前
文艺卿完成签到,获得积分10
44秒前
852应助小付采纳,获得10
48秒前
Chenyol发布了新的文献求助10
48秒前
Leofar完成签到 ,获得积分10
49秒前
吴雪完成签到 ,获得积分10
52秒前
贾明灵完成签到 ,获得积分10
54秒前
小马甲应助成就人杰采纳,获得10
57秒前
阿拉发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
活泼的代珊完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
任性的山芙完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
lXQ完成签到,获得积分20
1分钟前
科研通AI6.1应助阿拉采纳,获得10
1分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 5000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
Polymorphism and polytypism in crystals 1000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 纳米技术 化学工程 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 冶金 细胞生物学 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6020849
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7623465
关于积分的说明 16165695
捐赠科研通 5168593
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2766101
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1748520
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1636091