牙龈卟啉单胞菌
连翘
牙周炎
接收机工作特性
唾液
医学
微生物群
生物标志物
中间普氏菌
曲线下面积
诊断生物标志物
二、侵袭性牙周炎
内科学
牙科
诊断准确性
生物
病理
生物信息学
替代医学
金银花
中医药
生物化学
作者
Anbo Dong,Gordon Proctor,Svetislav Zarić
摘要
ABSTRACT Aim To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of microbiome‐derived biomarkers for periodontitis in oral fluids (saliva and subgingival samples). Methods This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines. Electronic searches were performed across multiple databases from December 2022 to November 2024. Subgroup analyses, divided into saliva and subgingival samples, were performed using the Random Effects Model (REM), while individual biomarker sensitivity and specificity were evaluated through the Bivariate Random‐Effects Model (BREM). Results Ten studies were included, stratified by sample type. In the saliva group, Porphyromonas gingivalis , Tannerella forsythia and Prevotella intermedia demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy, with sensitivities reaching 89.2%, 89.2% and 86.5%, and specificities of 94.6%, 86.5% and 83.8%, respectively, achieving AUC values above 0.80. Porphyromonas gingivalis was further analysed using BREM, with the Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic (SROC) curve indicating a combined sensitivity and specificity of 84.2% and 85.4%, with an AUC of 0.864. In the subgingival group, biomarkers such as endotoxin activity and combined bacterial biomarkers (5 bacterial species) displayed the highest diagnostic performance, with sensitivities of 90.6% and 85.1% and specificities of 87.9% and 100%, respectively, and AUC values of 0.93 and 0.88. Conclusion Microbiome‐derived biomarkers show good clinical utility for improving diagnoses of periodontitis, offering high specificity and sensitivity. Future research should focus on standardising methodologies, increasing sample sizes, and including diverse populations to validate these findings, thereby improving diagnostic precision and facilitating the screening methods for the onset of periodontitis and dysbiotic activity.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI