The NOVA classification system: A critical perspective in food science

分类 营销 食品加工 危害 食品安全 业务 消费(社会学) 食品科学 心理学 计算机科学 社会学 人工智能 社会科学 化学 社会心理学
作者
Rodrigo Rodrigues Petrus,Paulo José do Amaral Sobral,Carmen C. Tadini,Cintia B. Gonçalves
出处
期刊:Trends in Food Science and Technology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:116: 603-608 被引量:147
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.tifs.2021.08.010
摘要

Although the consumer enjoys many benefits provided by the current food processing technology, some health professionals and digital influencers suggest that there is little benefit and serious harm that could be due to poor nutrition, which was caused by the consumption of processed foods (PF). A new classification, known as NOVA, which classified foods into four groups, according to the level of processing was proposed. However, this classification does not accurately categorize food products by the level of the processing. In contrast, it considers the quantity of ingredients contained in the food. Therefore, the NOVA classification can lead to a negative perception by many consumers, because it neglects well-established science concepts from the food science domain. NOVA is based on the erroneous assumption that all commercially manufactured foods have low nutritional value, promote weight gain and chronic diseases to consumers because they contain sugar, salt and additives. It dismisses the proven benefits of diets chosen with the right mix of foods at all levels of processing. Disagreeing with some scientific studies, the NOVA classification suggests with inadequate data, that food prepared from basic ingredients at home has superior nutritional qualities to those produced by processors. Thus, some concepts have emerged in the public health field with special highlights to the term “ultra-processed” foods (UPF). This commentary addresses the NOVA classification system from the perspective of food science, which is responsible for the safety and reliability of virtually all the foods we eat. NOVA has classified food into four groups based on the type of processing: 1) Unprocessed and minimally processed foods, 2) Processed culinary ingredients, 3) Processed foods, and 4) “Ultra-processed” foods. The NOVA system is confusing and controversial. Knowledge of food engineering and/or science must be taken into consideration if food processing is the key for food classification. NOVA could be acceptable if it were based only on health concerns, but this was not the case.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Jemmy发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
周周完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
认真的rain发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
chlift发布了新的文献求助20
6秒前
6秒前
7秒前
犹豫问儿完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
白开水发布了新的文献求助20
7秒前
8秒前
9秒前
爱学习发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
企鹅发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
aajhajkahna应助卢乃旋采纳,获得10
9秒前
11秒前
ZZZ关注了科研通微信公众号
11秒前
11秒前
jiang完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
TSCL发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
彭于晏应助乐观寄风采纳,获得10
12秒前
苹果大侠发布了新的文献求助30
13秒前
66677788发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
14秒前
16秒前
温暖砖头发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
17秒前
菠萝吹雪完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
18秒前
18秒前
在水一方应助汤圆软软软采纳,获得10
18秒前
天天快乐应助汤圆软软软采纳,获得10
18秒前
Copyright应助汤圆软软软采纳,获得10
18秒前
19秒前
CipherSage应助汤圆软软软采纳,获得10
19秒前
乐乐应助汤圆软软软采纳,获得30
19秒前
积极天川应助汤圆软软软采纳,获得10
19秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Geist der Kunst und Kultur 1000
Resistance Spot Welding Dataset for Automobile Body-in-White Quality Analysis 748
悉尼大学博士学位论文,题目:Modelling and testing of one-sided stitched laminated composites. 作者:Kristopher P. Plain 700
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
丝光沸石活性位点定向调控及其二甲醚羰基化性能研究 500
Elgar Concise Encyclopedia of Research Methods in the Social Sciences 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7415460
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9018797
关于积分的说明 19213170
捐赠科研通 7046616
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3234136
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2396555
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2216386