Is the Revision Rate for Femoral Neck Fracture Lower for Total Hip Arthroplasty Than for Hemiarthroplasty?

医学 关节置换术 置信区间 股骨颈 外科 危险系数 比例危险模型 全髋关节置换术 体质指数 骨质疏松症 内科学
作者
Wayne Hoskins,Sophia Corfield,Michelle Lorimer,Yi Peng,Roger Bingham,Stephen E. Graves,Kelly G. Vince
出处
期刊:Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume [Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery]
卷期号:104 (17): 1530-1541 被引量:11
标识
DOI:10.2106/jbjs.21.01256
摘要

Background: When arthroplasty is indicated for a femoral neck fracture (FNF), it is unclear whether total hip arthroplasty (THA) or hemiarthroplasty (HA) is best. This study compares data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry using contemporary surgical options. Methods: Patients from 60 to 85 years old who were treated with arthroplasty for FNF, between September 1999 and December 2019, were included if the femoral stems were cemented. Only THAs with femoral heads of ≥36 mm or dual-mobility articulations were included. Patients who had monoblock HA were excluded. Rates of revision for all aseptic failures and dislocation were compared. Competing risks of revision and death were considered using the cumulative incidence function. Subdistribution hazard ratios (HRs) for revision or death from a Fine-Gray regression model were used to compare THA and HA. Interactions of procedure with age group and sex were considered. Secondary analysis adjusting for body mass index (BMI) and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification was also considered. Results: There were 4,551 THA and 29,714 HA procedures included. The rate of revision for THA was lower for women from 60 to 69 years old (HR = 0.58 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.39 to 0.85]) and from 70 to 74 years old (HR = 0.65 [95% CI, 0.43 to 0.98]) compared with HA. However, women from 80 to 85 years old (HR = 1.56 [95% CI, 1.03 to 2.35]) and men from 75 to 79 years old (HR = 1.61 [95% CI, 1.05 to 2.46]) and 80 to 85 years old (HR = 2.73 [95% CI, 1.89 to 3.95]) had an increased rate of revision when THA was undertaken compared with HA. There was no difference in the rate of revision for dislocation between THA and HA for either sex or age categories. Conclusions: When contemporary surgical options for FNF are used, there is a benefit with respect to revision outcomes for THA in women who are <75 years old and a benefit for HA in women who are ≥80 years old and men who are ≥75 years old. There is no difference in dislocation rates. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
现实的俊驰完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
王科婷发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
yyc完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
优美馒头完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
三明治发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
海洋完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
hanyy发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
3秒前
xw完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
今后应助赫绮琴采纳,获得10
3秒前
Zz完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
lxl发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
4秒前
ELMO完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
寒素完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
听说发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
Happy完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
YBR发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
优美馒头发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
科研通AI6.2应助夏陌采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
gaolengtu完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
zeng发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
只想退休的牛油果完成签到,获得积分20
9秒前
9秒前
树呢发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
科研小白完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
sssss发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
景行完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
科研通AI6.3应助zzz采纳,获得10
11秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Aerospace Standards Index - 2026 ASIN2026 3000
Polymorphism and polytypism in crystals 1000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Discrete-Time Signals and Systems 610
Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach, 9th Edition 500
Social Work and Social Welfare: An Invitation(7th Edition) 410
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6049219
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7836705
关于积分的说明 16262425
捐赠科研通 5194524
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2779531
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1762773
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1644807