Is the Revision Rate for Femoral Neck Fracture Lower for Total Hip Arthroplasty Than for Hemiarthroplasty?

医学 关节置换术 置信区间 股骨颈 外科 危险系数 比例危险模型 全髋关节置换术 体质指数 骨质疏松症 内科学
作者
Wayne T. Hoskins,Sophia Corfield,Michelle F. Lorimer,Yi Peng,Roger J. Bingham,Stephen E. Graves,Kelly George Vince
出处
期刊:Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume [Wolters Kluwer]
卷期号:104 (17): 1530-1541 被引量:14
标识
DOI:10.2106/jbjs.21.01256
摘要

BACKGROUND: When arthroplasty is indicated for a femoral neck fracture (FNF), it is unclear whether total hip arthroplasty (THA) or hemiarthroplasty (HA) is best. This study compares data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry using contemporary surgical options. METHODS: Patients from 60 to 85 years old who were treated with arthroplasty for FNF, between September 1999 and December 2019, were included if the femoral stems were cemented. Only THAs with femoral heads of ≥36 mm or dual-mobility articulations were included. Patients who had monoblock HA were excluded. Rates of revision for all aseptic failures and dislocation were compared. Competing risks of revision and death were considered using the cumulative incidence function. Subdistribution hazard ratios (HRs) for revision or death from a Fine-Gray regression model were used to compare THA and HA. Interactions of procedure with age group and sex were considered. Secondary analysis adjusting for body mass index (BMI) and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification was also considered. RESULTS: There were 4,551 THA and 29,714 HA procedures included. The rate of revision for THA was lower for women from 60 to 69 years old (HR = 0.58 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.39 to 0.85]) and from 70 to 74 years old (HR = 0.65 [95% CI, 0.43 to 0.98]) compared with HA. However, women from 80 to 85 years old (HR = 1.56 [95% CI, 1.03 to 2.35]) and men from 75 to 79 years old (HR = 1.61 [95% CI, 1.05 to 2.46]) and 80 to 85 years old (HR = 2.73 [95% CI, 1.89 to 3.95]) had an increased rate of revision when THA was undertaken compared with HA. There was no difference in the rate of revision for dislocation between THA and HA for either sex or age categories. CONCLUSIONS: When contemporary surgical options for FNF are used, there is a benefit with respect to revision outcomes for THA in women who are <75 years old and a benefit for HA in women who are ≥80 years old and men who are ≥75 years old. There is no difference in dislocation rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
桐桐的应助被jesse采纳,获得10
刚刚
小绵羊完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
精明雅柔发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
正直的碧完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
zzz完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
qq发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
心仪妹妹完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
肚子好饿完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
yanyanmi发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
完美世界的应助被DaveWang采纳,获得10
3秒前
ffgjh发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
拉拉缨发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
本本发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
maliwen的应助被LiLi采纳,获得10
5秒前
liu发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
ffgjh完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
李健的应助被张雪采纳,获得10
6秒前
ding的应助被VV采纳,获得10
6秒前
小马甲的应助被自由月光采纳,获得10
6秒前
爆米花的应助被手帕很忙采纳,获得10
6秒前
Whywhy发布了新的文献求助30
6秒前
平凡的一天完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
共享精神的应助被聪慧紫蓝采纳,获得10
6秒前
杨家南发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
hugdoggy发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
Haelina完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
yyy发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
111关注了科研通微信公众号
7秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Energie-Contracting 1500
Mathematical models in hydrology 1000
Klimaschutzrecht durch den Energiesektor im Mehrebenensystem – Ein Rechtsvergleich 1000
Oncology Clinical Trials: Successful Design, Conduct, and Analysis, Second Edition 800
Butadiene hydroxytelechelic oligomers PBHT 500
Ecotourism 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8080149
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9496582
关于积分的说明 21395150
捐赠科研通 7648323
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3401113
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2530491
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2439918