Is the Revision Rate for Femoral Neck Fracture Lower for Total Hip Arthroplasty Than for Hemiarthroplasty?

医学 关节置换术 置信区间 股骨颈 外科 危险系数 比例危险模型 全髋关节置换术 体质指数 骨质疏松症 内科学
作者
Wayne Hoskins,Sophia Corfield,Michelle Lorimer,Yi Peng,Roger Bingham,Stephen E. Graves,Kelly G. Vince
出处
期刊:Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume [Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery]
卷期号:104 (17): 1530-1541 被引量:11
标识
DOI:10.2106/jbjs.21.01256
摘要

Background: When arthroplasty is indicated for a femoral neck fracture (FNF), it is unclear whether total hip arthroplasty (THA) or hemiarthroplasty (HA) is best. This study compares data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry using contemporary surgical options. Methods: Patients from 60 to 85 years old who were treated with arthroplasty for FNF, between September 1999 and December 2019, were included if the femoral stems were cemented. Only THAs with femoral heads of ≥36 mm or dual-mobility articulations were included. Patients who had monoblock HA were excluded. Rates of revision for all aseptic failures and dislocation were compared. Competing risks of revision and death were considered using the cumulative incidence function. Subdistribution hazard ratios (HRs) for revision or death from a Fine-Gray regression model were used to compare THA and HA. Interactions of procedure with age group and sex were considered. Secondary analysis adjusting for body mass index (BMI) and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification was also considered. Results: There were 4,551 THA and 29,714 HA procedures included. The rate of revision for THA was lower for women from 60 to 69 years old (HR = 0.58 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.39 to 0.85]) and from 70 to 74 years old (HR = 0.65 [95% CI, 0.43 to 0.98]) compared with HA. However, women from 80 to 85 years old (HR = 1.56 [95% CI, 1.03 to 2.35]) and men from 75 to 79 years old (HR = 1.61 [95% CI, 1.05 to 2.46]) and 80 to 85 years old (HR = 2.73 [95% CI, 1.89 to 3.95]) had an increased rate of revision when THA was undertaken compared with HA. There was no difference in the rate of revision for dislocation between THA and HA for either sex or age categories. Conclusions: When contemporary surgical options for FNF are used, there is a benefit with respect to revision outcomes for THA in women who are <75 years old and a benefit for HA in women who are ≥80 years old and men who are ≥75 years old. There is no difference in dislocation rates. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
华仔应助初见采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
科研通AI6应助搬砖采纳,获得10
2秒前
NexusExplorer应助林木木采纳,获得10
2秒前
123完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
科研Mayormm完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
lzt发布了新的文献求助30
3秒前
4秒前
5秒前
JustinHarry完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
科研Mayormm发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
XianyunWang完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
8秒前
哈哈发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
初见完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
nenoaowu发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
风宝宝完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
balabala完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
yankai完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
可耐的寒松完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
陈皮完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
田様应助李子采纳,获得10
11秒前
田様应助曲奇采纳,获得10
11秒前
12秒前
风华墨染发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
热情的乐荷完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
14秒前
科研通AI6应助struggle采纳,获得10
14秒前
16秒前
16秒前
spc68应助欢呼涑采纳,获得10
17秒前
英俊的铭应助QinCaibin采纳,获得10
17秒前
孟斯扬完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
林木木发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Basic And Clinical Science Course 2025-2026 3000
人脑智能与人工智能 1000
花の香りの秘密―遺伝子情報から機能性まで 800
Process Plant Design for Chemical Engineers 400
Principles of Plasma Discharges and Materials Processing, 3rd Edition 400
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5613692
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4698791
关于积分的说明 14898976
捐赠科研通 4736882
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2547121
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1511036
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1473602