亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整的填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Classification of Surgical Complications

医学 分级(工程) 队列 并发症 学术机构 排名(信息检索) 梅德林 外科 普通外科 内科学 工程类 法学 图书馆学 土木工程 政治学 机器学习 计算机科学
作者
Daniel Dindo,Nicolas Demartines,Pierre Alain Clavien
出处
期刊:Annals of Surgery [Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
卷期号:240 (2): 205-213 被引量:23904
标识
DOI:10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
摘要

In Brief Objective: Although quality assessment is gaining increasing attention, there is still no consensus on how to define and grade postoperative complications. This shortcoming hampers comparison of outcome data among different centers and therapies and over time. Patients and Methods: A classification of complications published by one of the authors in 1992 was critically re-evaluated and modified to increase its accuracy and its acceptability in the surgical community. Modifications mainly focused on the manner of reporting life-threatening and permanently disabling complications. The new grading system still mostly relies on the therapy used to treat the complication. The classification was tested in a cohort of 6336 patients who underwent elective general surgery at our institution. The reproducibility and personal judgment of the classification were evaluated through an international survey with 2 questionnaires sent to 10 surgical centers worldwide. Results: The new ranking system significantly correlated with complexity of surgery (P < 0.0001) as well as with the length of the hospital stay (P < 0.0001). A total of 144 surgeons from 10 different centers around the world and at different levels of training returned the survey. Ninety percent of the case presentations were correctly graded. The classification was considered to be simple (92% of the respondents), reproducible (91%), logical (92%), useful (90%), and comprehensive (89%). The answers of both questionnaires were not dependent on the origin of the reply and the level of training of the surgeons. Conclusions: The new complication classification appears reliable and may represent a compelling tool for quality assessment in surgery in all parts of the world. The lack of a uniform way of reporting complications hampers interpretation of surgical outcome data and quality assessment. The authors revisited a previously reported classification of complications and propose a new grading system. The new classification was tested in a cohort of 6336 patients undergoing general surgery and through an international survey.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Hayat应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
3秒前
Ava应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
zsmj23完成签到 ,获得积分0
11秒前
hby完成签到,获得积分20
32秒前
mll0805发布了新的文献求助10
37秒前
51秒前
Mike001发布了新的文献求助10
56秒前
1分钟前
Jerry发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
寻道图强应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
2分钟前
Jerry完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
HaoHao04完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
6分钟前
HongqiZhang发布了新的文献求助10
6分钟前
LLLAAAYYY完成签到 ,获得积分10
6分钟前
可靠的大侠完成签到 ,获得积分10
7分钟前
ZXD1989完成签到 ,获得积分10
7分钟前
充电宝应助旋转木mua采纳,获得10
7分钟前
弹棉花完成签到,获得积分10
7分钟前
情怀应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8分钟前
赎罪完成签到 ,获得积分10
8分钟前
奋斗的小张完成签到 ,获得积分10
9分钟前
青岚完成签到 ,获得积分10
9分钟前
那啥完成签到 ,获得积分0
9分钟前
坦率狗发布了新的文献求助10
10分钟前
Shueason完成签到 ,获得积分10
10分钟前
wait完成签到 ,获得积分10
11分钟前
坦率狗完成签到,获得积分10
11分钟前
火山完成签到 ,获得积分10
12分钟前
12分钟前
12分钟前
唐横发布了新的文献求助10
13分钟前
13分钟前
坦率狗关注了科研通微信公众号
13分钟前
13分钟前
14分钟前
14分钟前
14分钟前
14分钟前
15分钟前
高分求助中
Teaching Social and Emotional Learning in Physical Education 900
Plesiosaur extinction cycles; events that mark the beginning, middle and end of the Cretaceous 800
Boris Pesce - Gli impiegati della Fiat dal 1955 al 1999 un percorso nella memoria 500
Chinese-English Translation Lexicon Version 3.0 500
Recherches Ethnographiques sue les Yao dans la Chine du Sud 500
Two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis reveals causal relationships between blood lipids and venous thromboembolism 500
[Lambert-Eaton syndrome without calcium channel autoantibodies] 460
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 有机化学 工程类 生物化学 纳米技术 物理 内科学 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 电极 光电子学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2395827
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2098677
关于积分的说明 5289046
捐赠科研通 1826060
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 910467
版权声明 559985
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 486617