Addition of the Neurokinin-1-Receptor Antagonist (RA) Aprepitant to a 5-Hydroxytryptamine-RA and Dexamethasone in the Prophylaxis of Nausea and Vomiting Due to Radiation Therapy With Concomitant Cisplatin

消炎药 医学 相伴的 恶心 止吐药 养生 呕吐 NK1受体拮抗剂 内科学 地塞米松 临床终点 麻醉 肿瘤科 随机对照试验 P物质 受体 神经肽
作者
Franziska Jahn,Anica Riesner,Patrick Jahn,Frank Sieker,Dirk Vordermark,Karin Jordan
出处
期刊:International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:92 (5): 1101-1107 被引量:14
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.04.037
摘要

Purpose To assess, in a prospective, observational study, the safety and efficacy of the addition of the neurokinin-1-receptor antagonist (NK1-RA) aprepitant to concomitant radiochemotherapy, for the prophylaxis of radiation therapy–induced nausea and vomiting. Patients and Methods This prospective observational study compared the antiemetic efficacy of an NK1-RA (aprepitant), a 5-hydroxytryptamine-RA, and dexamethasone (aprepitant regimen) versus a 5-hydroxytryptamine-RA and dexamethasone (control regimen) in patients receiving concomitant radiochemotherapy with cisplatin at the Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Germany. The primary endpoint was complete response in the overall phase, defined as no vomiting and no use of rescue therapy in this period. Results Fifty-nine patients treated with concomitant radiochemotherapy with cisplatin were included in this study. Thirty-one patients received the aprepitant regimen and 29 the control regimen. The overall complete response rates for cycles 1 and 2 were 75.9% and 64.5% for the aprepitant group and 60.7% and 54.2% for the control group, respectively. Although a 15.2% absolute difference was reached in cycle 1, a statistical significance was not detected (P=.22). Furthermore maximum nausea was 1.58 ± 1.91 in the control group and 0.73 ± 1.79 in the aprepitant group (P=.084); for the head-and-neck subset, 2.23 ± 2.13 in the control group and 0.64 ± 1.77 in the aprepitant group, respectively (P=.03). Conclusion This is the first study of an NK1-RA–containing antiemetic prophylaxis regimen in patients receiving concomitant radiochemotherapy. Although the primary endpoint was not obtained, the absolute difference of 10% in efficacy was reached, which is defined as clinically meaningful for patients by international guidelines groups. Randomized phase 3 studies are necessary to further define the potential role of an NK1-RA in this setting. To assess, in a prospective, observational study, the safety and efficacy of the addition of the neurokinin-1-receptor antagonist (NK1-RA) aprepitant to concomitant radiochemotherapy, for the prophylaxis of radiation therapy–induced nausea and vomiting. This prospective observational study compared the antiemetic efficacy of an NK1-RA (aprepitant), a 5-hydroxytryptamine-RA, and dexamethasone (aprepitant regimen) versus a 5-hydroxytryptamine-RA and dexamethasone (control regimen) in patients receiving concomitant radiochemotherapy with cisplatin at the Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Germany. The primary endpoint was complete response in the overall phase, defined as no vomiting and no use of rescue therapy in this period. Fifty-nine patients treated with concomitant radiochemotherapy with cisplatin were included in this study. Thirty-one patients received the aprepitant regimen and 29 the control regimen. The overall complete response rates for cycles 1 and 2 were 75.9% and 64.5% for the aprepitant group and 60.7% and 54.2% for the control group, respectively. Although a 15.2% absolute difference was reached in cycle 1, a statistical significance was not detected (P=.22). Furthermore maximum nausea was 1.58 ± 1.91 in the control group and 0.73 ± 1.79 in the aprepitant group (P=.084); for the head-and-neck subset, 2.23 ± 2.13 in the control group and 0.64 ± 1.77 in the aprepitant group, respectively (P=.03). This is the first study of an NK1-RA–containing antiemetic prophylaxis regimen in patients receiving concomitant radiochemotherapy. Although the primary endpoint was not obtained, the absolute difference of 10% in efficacy was reached, which is defined as clinically meaningful for patients by international guidelines groups. Randomized phase 3 studies are necessary to further define the potential role of an NK1-RA in this setting.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
不安丹云完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
4秒前
zhaoyaoshi完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
wei完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
会撒娇的手机完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
halo完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
胡涵暄完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
欣喜成仁完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
11秒前
12秒前
DOUBLE完成签到,获得积分0
12秒前
wl完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
Fyh19901116完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
Claire完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
肖飞鱼完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
谨慎的佐罗完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
徐jh完成签到 ,获得积分20
17秒前
研友_n0kjPL完成签到,获得积分0
18秒前
瑾沫流年yu完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
浑天与发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
ZHDNCG完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
湖以完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
浑天与完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
棠以秧完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
zy完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
懒大王完成签到 ,获得积分10
29秒前
29秒前
舒适涵山完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
天行健完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
renwoxing完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
chen完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
junjie完成签到,获得积分10
34秒前
闻巷雨完成签到 ,获得积分10
35秒前
小白完成签到 ,获得积分10
36秒前
XCY发布了新的文献求助10
36秒前
36秒前
38秒前
现实的寄灵完成签到,获得积分10
39秒前
LEO2025完成签到 ,获得积分10
40秒前
热心市民完成签到 ,获得积分10
40秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The anomeric effect 1000
Principles of town planning: translating concepts to applications 1000
Navigating Normative Orders: Interdisciplinary Perspectives 750
1 Peter and Christ's Descent to the Dead in Its Early Christian Reception 700
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7732545
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9283362
关于积分的说明 20156915
捐赠科研通 7310109
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3304154
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2456992
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2313268