地理
印欧语系
印度太平洋
生物
进化生物学
计算机科学
语言学
历史
生态学
哲学
作者
Paul Heggarty,Cormac Anderson,Matthew Scarborough,Benedict King,Remco Bouckaert,Lechosław Jocz,Martin Joachim Kümmel,Thomas Jügel,Britta Irslinger,Roland A. Pooth,Henrik Liljegren,Richard F. Strand,Geoffrey Haig,Martin Macák,Ronald Kim,Erik Anonby,Tijmen Pronk,Oleg Belyaev,Tonya Kim Dewey-Findell,Matthew Boutilier
出处
期刊:Science
[American Association for the Advancement of Science]
日期:2023-07-27
卷期号:381 (6656)
被引量:105
标识
DOI:10.1126/science.abg0818
摘要
The origins of the Indo-European language family are hotly disputed. Bayesian phylogenetic analyses of core vocabulary have produced conflicting results, with some supporting a farming expansion out of Anatolia c. 9000 BP, while others support a spread with horse-based pastoralism out of the Pontic-Caspian Steppe c. 6000 BP. Here we present an extensive new database of Indo-European core vocabulary that eliminates past inconsistencies in cognate coding. Ancestry-enabled phylogenetic analysis of our new dataset indicates that few ancient languages are direct ancestors of modern clades, and produces a root age for the family of c. 8120 BP. While this date is not consistent with the Steppe hypothesis, it does not rule out an initial homeland south of the Caucasus, with a subsequent branch northwards onto the Steppe and then across Europe. We reconcile this “hybrid hypothesis” with recently published ancient DNA evidence from the Steppe and the northern Fertile Crescent.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI