联盟
心理学
多维标度
普通合伙企业
构造(python库)
会话(web分析)
开放的体验
内部一致性
比例(比率)
社会心理学
临床心理学
心理治疗师
心理测量学
统计
计算机科学
量子力学
物理
万维网
经济
程序设计语言
法学
数学
政治学
财务
作者
Roxane Agnew-Davies,William B. Stiles,Gillian E. Hardy,Michael Barkham,David A. Shapiro
标识
DOI:10.1111/j.2044-8260.1998.tb01291.x
摘要
We used a new instrument, the Agnew Relationship Measure (ARM), to examine the alliance's dimensionality and to construct scales for use in future studies.We studied the alliance as reported on the ARM by both clients and therapists in the Second Sheffield Psychotherapy Project, a randomized comparison of two contrasting time-limited psychotherapies for depression.Clients (N = 95) and therapists (N = 5) completed parallel forms of the (ARM) after every session (N = 1120).Five scales were constructed, based on results of simultaneous components analyses and considerations of conceptual coherence and comparability across client and therapist perspectives.Bond, partnership, and confidence overlapped statistically (consistent with previous studies), but there are conceptual and empirical reasons for retaining the distinctions. Openness represented a relatively independent dimension. The client initiative scale had low internal consistency but the items may have value for future investigations.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI